Teams

Cedars Peters

2022 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Weekend · 4.5 W Saturday

8 players · average NTRP 4.38 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-11vs Payne Park KlemeyerWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Peters / Elizabeth Green vs Lisa Klemeyer / Tanya Kelly6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-04vs Longwood WilsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Peters / Sarah Winters vs Lynn Deuitch / Gina Damaia6-3, 6-4
2022-05-14Lost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Green / Jennifer Peters vs Debbie Crowley / Agnes Toth7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2022-04-30vs Sarasota - River Strand/AriiSplit 11
L#2 DoublesChristie Boylston / Lori Faunce vs Motoyo Arii / Kristi Henn2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJennifer Peters / Jennifer Bright vs Margaret Petersen / Desiree Lurf6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Peters / Jennifer Bright vs Debbie Crowley / Elizabeth Park6-1, 7-6
2022-04-16vs Longwood WilsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Bright / Jennifer Peters vs Lee Bailey / Mary Wilson6-3, 6-2
2022-04-02vs Sarasota - River Strand/AriiLost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Peters / Jennifer Bright vs Sarah McNeill / Karen Brenneman1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Christie Boylston
published 4.5
4.29
Allyson Hoffman
published 4.5
4.27
Marika Lindholm
published
4.23
Jennifer Bright
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.09
Cindy Rosenberg
published 4
4.01
Jennifer Peters
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.79
Elizabeth Green
published 4.5
Lori Faunce
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Green + Allyson Hoffman2354% games+3.2% vs expected
Jennifer Bright + Jennifer Peters312152% games−0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christie Boylston
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Allyson Hoffman
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.29
Marika Lindholm
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
Jennifer Bright
100W–61L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4
Cindy Rosenberg
81W–65L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%25%75%
4.09
Jennifer Peters
65W–49L career · 7 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
4.01
4.5
Elizabeth Green
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
3.79
Lori Faunce
41W–22L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.