Teams

ST MARY 18MX9.0A

2024 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX9.0

20 players · average NTRP 4.61 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18&Over MX9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.86
Nick Stocker
published
Arvind Stokes
published 5
4.63
Timothy Rogers
published
4.60
Elliot Feinberg
published 5
4.52
Cristina Tudor
published 5
4.44
Sabrina Thong
published
4.44
Noa Ramo-Larios
published
4.26
Jessica Kim
published
4.18
Bryan Rodrigues
published 4.5
4.15
Ellen Low
published 4.5
4.15
Barry Seeman
published 4.5
4.01
Mai Angsupanich
published
3.94
Angela Merola
published 4
3.84
Kristen Foster
published
3.82
Nancy Deschane
published
3.82
Devon Brodhead
published 4
3.68
Rachel Nickolette
published
3.34
Tara Navarro
published
Kermit Strachan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bryan Rodrigues + Jessica Kim4257% gamesnot enough data
Timothy Rogers + Kristen Foster123 matchesnot enough data
Timothy Rogers + Jessica Kim033 matchesnot enough data
Timothy Rogers + Nancy Deschane213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nick Stocker
9W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%14%
4.86
5
Arvind Stokes
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Timothy Rogers
22W–11L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
4.63
5
Elliot Feinberg
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.60
5
Cristina Tudor
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
44%55%<1%
4.52
Sabrina Thong
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
4.44
Noa Ramo-Larios
17W–13L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
4.44
5
Alex Milosh Stephanovich
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
4.26
Jessica Kim
31W–15L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Bryan Rodrigues
24W–15L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Ellen Low
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
4.15
4.5
Barry Seeman
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
4.15
Mai Angsupanich
8W–13L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
4.01
4
Angela Merola
43W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
Kristen Foster
20W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.84
Nancy Deschane
18W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Devon Brodhead
19W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
Rachel Nickolette
16W–10L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
Tara Navarro
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%0%
3.34
Kermit Strachan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.