Teams

West Homewood - Lacey

2024 B'ham Combo - Adult 18 & Over Women Weekday · 6.5 Friday Morning

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 Friday Morning have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Sarah Bingham
published
3.63
Margaret Lacey
published
3.36
Laura Dreer
published
3.33
Pam Gilmer
published
3.31
Amanda Hilsmier
published 3.5
3.31
Pamela White
published
3.26
Jennifer Chadha
published
3.13
Ashley O'Neal
published 3.5
2.93
Deana Hughes
published 3
2.78
Sally Hoerner
published
2.71
Abbie McCary
published 3
2.52
Victoria Hastings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Hilsmier + Laura Dreer5161% games+5.3% vs expected
Sarah Bingham + Margaret Lacey8260% games+4.6% vs expected
Laura Dreer + Sarah Bingham314 matchesnot enough data
Pamela White + Jennifer Chadha314 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Hilsmier + Ashley O'Neal123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Bingham
78W–28L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.90
Margaret Lacey
52W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.63
Laura Dreer
83W–54L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%14%
3.36
Pam Gilmer
26W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Amanda Hilsmier
52W–37L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%8%
3.31
Pamela White
34W–25L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%8%
3.31
Jennifer Chadha
22W–26L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Ashley O'Neal
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
Deana Hughes
45W–36L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
2.93
Sally Hoerner
22W–19L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Abbie McCary
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.71
Victoria Hastings
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.