Teams

MSIL 6.5 Winter Combo Mixed Neeley-Peoria

2026 Combo Mixed · MSIL 6.5 Combo Mixed

15 players · average NTRP 3.19 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesElaina Rhoades / Shekar Arcot vs Molly McMahon / Sung Min Moon0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesElaine Hardy / Muthiah Muthukumar vs Molly Tracy / Gawon Lee2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBelinda Rohn / Christopher Hardy vs Minsook Kim / Hyegi Min3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesShekar Arcot / Kristen Burkard vs Thomas Sanner / Maribeth Dura6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMuthiah Muthukumar / Elaina Rhoades vs Erik Siembab / Tenley Banik2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJoe Mulcahey / Michele Kendall vs Brett Henneberg / Rini Stoltz1-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesChristopher Hardy / Elaina Rhoades vs Sally Boland / Anthony Pepe1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChris Burkard / Ashley Dallapiazza vs Michael Ballinger / Megan Comerford6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJason Mcgary / Elaine Hardy vs Brittany Pope / Joshua Risinger1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesAngelia Neeley / Jason Mcgary vs Lijian Zhang / JOOYEN KIM0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Dallapiazza / Chris Burkard vs Alden Cheng / Caroline Cox0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesElaina Rhoades / Christopher Hardy vs Kai Wang / Karolyn Smith0-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesJason Mcgary / Elaine Hardy vs Chansun Shin / Suejung Han7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBradley Douglas / Angelia Neeley vs Nicholas Troehler / Allison Bertsche6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKristen Burkard / Shekar Arcot vs Philip Woodrum / Maribeth Dura6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesShekar Arcot / Belinda Rohn vs Sonthana Thongsithavong / Ginny Kerwin4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJason Mcgary / Michele Kendall vs Brittany Pope / Sean Miller4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAngelia Neeley / Bradley Douglas vs Megan Comerford / Michael Ballinger0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · MSIL 6.5 Combo Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MSIL 6.5 Winter Combo Mixed Wang-Champaign5113511108
2MSIL 6.5 Winter Combo Mixed Hogan-Decatur4210819171
3MSIL 6.5 Winter Combo Mixed Stoltz-Bloomington2481023182
4MSIL 6.5 Winter Combo Mixed Neeley-Peoria1551328194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Ashley Dallapiazza
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Bradley Douglas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.38
Michele Kendall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Shekar Arcot
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.05
Elaine Hardy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
Belinda Rohn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Kristen Burkard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Joe Mulcahey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Angelia Neeley
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.31
Christopher Hardy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.25
Chris Burkard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Elaina Rhoades
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jason Mcgary
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Monica Hendrickson
published
Muthiah Muthukumar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shekar Arcot + Kristen Burkard5257% gamesnot enough data
Joe Mulcahey + Angelia Neeley0534% gamesnot enough data
Elaine Hardy + Christopher Hardy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ashley Dallapiazza
22W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.78
4
Bradley Douglas
8W–13L career · type M · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michele Kendall
59W–80L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
Shekar Arcot
36W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Elaine Hardy
99W–68L career · 4 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Belinda Rohn
67W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Kristen Burkard
56W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.90
Joe Mulcahey
29W–59L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
2.5
Angelia Neeley
21W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%26%74%
2.59
3
Christopher Hardy
1W–16L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
2.31
2.5
Chris Burkard
4W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
Elaina Rhoades
8W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jason Mcgary
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Monica Hendrickson
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Muthiah Muthukumar
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.