Teams

Di.Sauer55C

2026 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-24vs Ca.Conzola55C7.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTobi Buckley / Diane Sauer vs Jane Hunter / Gillian Kelleher4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKristine Potter / Virgina Wilson vs Julie Brigham / Laura Davidson1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Merdes / Phyllis Soltz vs Marina Barthalmus / Camille Conzola0-6, 3-6
2026-08-17vs Am.Barclay55CLost 03
L#1 DoublesTobi Buckley / Virgina Wilson vs Kristin Lahey / Brenda Li2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBobbie West / Amy Merdes vs Sarah Shelby / Ann Gray1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTammy Kozacko / Phyllis Soltz vs Jennifer Kuzma / Patrice Dovel1-6, 4-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Diane Sauer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Meike Schacht
published
3.35
Kristine Potter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Virgina Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.20
Tammy Kozacko
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Tobi Buckley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Bobbie West
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Phyllis Soltz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Amy Merdes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tobi Buckley + Amy Merdes12852% games+4.7% vs expected
Tobi Buckley + Diane Sauer443054% games+1.5% vs expected
Diane Sauer + Virgina Wilson4355% gamesnot enough data
Virgina Wilson + Kristine Potter4259% gamesnot enough data
Amy Merdes + Diane Sauer4159% gamesnot enough data
Phyllis Soltz + Tammy Kozacko224 matchesnot enough data
Tobi Buckley + Meike Schacht213 matchesnot enough data
Bobbie West + Amy Merdes033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Sauer
136W–88L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%22%
3.39
Meike Schacht
9W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Kristine Potter
145W–69L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
3
Virgina Wilson
50W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.21
Tammy Kozacko
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Tobi Buckley
146W–124L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Bobbie West
0W–6L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Phyllis Soltz
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Amy Merdes
90W–118L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.