Teams

6 ACAC Hatcher

2022 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-07-17vs 8 Willow Oaks BlackwoodLost 01
L#1 DoublesKen Hatcher / Jesse Smith vs Terence Blackwood / Agustin Rodriguez6-7, 4-6
W#1 DoublesKen Hatcher / Jesse Smith vs Mark Reams / James Mullahy5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-30vs 3 CCV Murphy ParkerWon 10
W#2 DoublesToussaint Manley / Jesse Smith vs Madison Wootton / Thayer Montague6-0, 6-0
2022-06-19vs 9 ACAC WilsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJesse Smith / Ken Hatcher vs Scott McFadden / Matt Pepple7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Anthony Forgey
published 4
3.63
Eddie Kim
published 3.5
3.51
Jesse Smith
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.39
Darrell Eakes
published 3.5
3.34
Dave Bucheit
published 3.5
3.33
Toussaint Manley
published
3.33
Steve Leighty
published
3.31
John Kosco
published
3.31
Ken Hatcher
published
2.83
Dave Booth
published 3
2.70
Andrew Gillies
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dave Bucheit + Ken Hatcher123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anthony Forgey
33W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.81
3.5
Eddie Kim
30W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%17%83%
3.63
4
Jesse Smith
166W–117L career · 8 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Darrell Eakes
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Dave Bucheit
19W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
Toussaint Manley
10W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.33
Steve Leighty
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
John Kosco
12W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.31
Ken Hatcher
15W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.31
3
Dave Booth
19W–20L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Andrew Gillies
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.