Teams

Mitchell/ Flam

2022 Loudoun Tri-Level 18 & Over Women · Loudoun Tri-Level 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.57 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-07-18vs Hopkins/ LarnerLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Carruthers / Adrel Byrd vs Wendy Hopkins / Jennifer DeCamp2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-06-14vs Providakes / NixLost 01
L#2 DoublesCynthia Pointer / Jill White vs Wendy Bush / Michelle Tenhaeff3-6, 3-6
2022-06-09vs Kaplan/ ZimmermanLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren Triplett / Eleanor McManus vs Sharon DiRenzo / Kimianne Lee3-6, 0-6
2022-06-02vs Pongsugree/ O'ConnorLost 12
L#1 DoublesAdrel Byrd / Mary Ann Larson vs Christina Schinner / Jill Poretz0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJeannie Matteson / Cynthia Pointer vs Kathleen McFarlane / Tina Le6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Malloy / Eleanor McManus vs Christine Feit / Mindi Moshides2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Tri-Level 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Adrel Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Tara Brill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.63
Mary Ann Larson
published
3.62
Melissa Carruthers
published
3.54
Kendall Mccaughey
published
3.27
Eleanor McManus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Anne Flam
published 3.5
3.12
Lisa Moffett
published
3.08
Cynthia Pointer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Jeannie Matteson
published
2.97
Danielle Davis
published 3.5
2.95
Jill White
published
2.71
April Rabayda
published 3
2.29
Karen Triplett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tara Brill + Adrel Byrd404 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Moffett + Jeannie Matteson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adrel Byrd
113W–69L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Tara Brill
125W–88L career · 8 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Mary Ann Larson
10W–16L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Melissa Carruthers
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Kendall Mccaughey
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Eleanor McManus
187W–113L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Anne Flam
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.25
Lisa Moffett
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Cynthia Pointer
106W–128L career · 2 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
Jeannie Matteson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Danielle Davis
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
2.97
Jill White
26W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
April Rabayda
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.71
Karen Triplett
16W–9L career · no lines in 2022
0%95%5%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.