Teams

WESB:Westboro Blue:Benoit

2024 EMA Tri Level Fall Women · 4.5W Women

4 players · average NTRP 4.50 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-03vs WESB:Westboro Red:Waung/LoLost 01
L#1 DoublesNora Hannigan / Cara Mccormack vs Cassy Waung / Michelle Lo6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2024-10-27vs WOB:Unstrung Heroes:MaguireWon 10
W#1 DoublesLindsay Benoit / Nora Hannigan vs Nancy Irving / Allison Vizgaitis6-3, 6-4
2024-10-20vs WTC:Winchester:Crabtree/BacallaWon 10
W#1 DoublesLindsay Benoit / Cara Mccormack vs Dana Bacalla / Hayley Doria6-2, 6-1
2024-10-13vs WESB:Westboro Red:Waung/LoWon 10
W#1 DoublesLindsay Benoit / Mary Carroll vs Michelle Lo / Elena Wood6-2, 6-2
2024-10-06vs WOB:Unstrung Heroes:MaguireWon 10
W#1 DoublesLindsay Benoit / Mary Carroll vs Anna Dyakiv / Nancy Irving6-2, 6-3
2024-09-28vs WTC:Winchester:Crabtree/BacallaWon 10
W#1 DoublesLindsay Benoit / Mary Carroll vs Carolynn Crabtree / Pamela Jeppson6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.5W Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WESB:Westboro Blue:Benoit5151231
2WESB:Westboro Red:Waung/Lo2222643
3WOB:Unstrung Heroes:Maguire2323646
4WTC:Winchester:Crabtree/Bacalla1414849

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Mary Carroll
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.29
Lindsay Benoit
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.28
Cara Mccormack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.99
Nora Hannigan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Benoit + Mary Carroll11655% games−2.7% vs expected
Lindsay Benoit + Nora Hannigan314 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Benoit + Cara Mccormack123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Carroll
164W–112L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
4.34
Lindsay Benoit
38W–23L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Cara Mccormack
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
4.28
Nora Hannigan
122W–49L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.