Teams

Foxworth (Kristin Funt)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 40 & Over Business Women (Tuesday PM) · 3.5 Women (3 Lines of Doubles - No Singles Play)

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesAmy Kippels / Cathi Levinson vs Dawn Lockwood / Shirley Tong6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKaty Cleveland / Megan Kim vs Theresa Scott / Suzanne Rigdon6-0, 6-2
W#1 DoublesDenise Sperier / Heather Davis vs Heather Dobbs / Princess Snyder6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKim Rutledge / Aubry Canales vs Diane Park / Ran Tao5-7, 6-2, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJulie Zurn / Katy Cleveland vs Anja Giles / Jennifer Nutt7-5, 7-6
2026-03-17vs MJCCA (Sarah Kirshner)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesDenise Sperier / Kelly McLoughlin vs Melanie Cummings / Lindsay Medwed3-6, 6-3, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Kim / Katy Cleveland vs Sarah Kirshner / Amy Fox6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNevada Serra / Julie Zurn vs Fredricka Kahn / Melissa Marion-Landais2-6, 6-2, 6-3
2026-03-03vs St Marlo (Shriya Diskalkar)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesJulie de la Rosa / Denise Sperier vs Tamilselvi Kumar / Sanam Mithani6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKelly McLoughlin / Nicole Rothwell vs Shriya Diskalkar / Sonal Valiani6-7, 6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKristin Funt / Megan Kim vs Lakhbir Sidhu / Medhavi Chaphekar7-6, 6-1
2026-02-24vs EE Robinson Park (Jenny Lee)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesAubry Canales / Kim Rutledge vs Eun Kwon / Hye Yoo5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNevada Serra / Megan Kim vs Euna Jang / Mi Lee6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKelly McLoughlin / Denise Sperier vs Su Kim / Hoonee Chung6-1, 6-0
W#1 DoublesKristin Funt / Kelly McLoughlin vs Jennifer Boro / Susan Bailey7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKaty Cleveland / Denise Sperier vs Theresa Scott / Dawn Lockwood6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAmy Kippels / Julie de la Rosa vs Tammy Jones / Mary Beth Henderson6-2, 7-6
2026-02-10vs Lansmoore Club (Sujung Chie)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesNevada Serra / Amy Kippels vs Amy Cho / Sun Kim3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKristin Funt / Heather Davis vs Amy Chung / Genny Han1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNicole Rothwell / Kelly McLoughlin vs Shannon Shin / Moonie Choi7-6, 3-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women (3 Lines of Doubles - No Singles Play) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Katy Cleveland
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.47
Denise Sperier
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.43
Kelly McLoughlin
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.41
Kim Rutledge
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Kristin Funt
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Nevada Serra
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Julie de la Rosa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Amy Kippels
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Aubry Canales
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Nicole Rothwell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Julie Zurn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Megan Kim
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Zurn + Amy Kippels6258% games+10.2% vs expected
Megan Kim + Katy Cleveland5162% games+5.3% vs expected
Amy Kippels + Nevada Serra224 matchesnot enough data
Denise Sperier + Katy Cleveland303 matchesnot enough data
Kim Rutledge + Nicole Rothwell213 matchesnot enough data
Kim Rutledge + Katy Cleveland303 matchesnot enough data
Amy Kippels + Nicole Rothwell213 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Rothwell + Nevada Serra213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katy Cleveland
28W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%56%43%
3.48
3.5
Denise Sperier
17W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Kelly McLoughlin
9W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Kim Rutledge
18W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
Kristin Funt
37W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Nevada Serra
16W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
Julie de la Rosa
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Amy Kippels
51W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Aubry Canales
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Nicole Rothwell
15W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
Julie Zurn
45W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Megan Kim
13W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.