Teams

KChapman/PSercer (Piper Glen)

2024 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Men - Thurs PM

11 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-25vs EBostic (WSRC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKristoff Goson / Joseph Garner vs Brett Harrell / Bennett Terada2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKenneth Godfrey / Paul Sercer vs Kevin Stein / Eric O'Brien1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKevin Smith / Paul Sercer vs Dean Brown / Joey Chen6-1, 6-1
2024-04-11vs PTighe (Blakeney)Won 10
W#2 SinglesPaul Sercer vs PATRICK TIGHE6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2024-03-21vs TZimmer (PPRSC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesPaul Sercer / Kevin Smith vs Craig Menninger / David Moore6-2, 7-6
2024-03-14vs EBostic (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Sercer / Joseph Garner vs Brett Harrell / Bennett Terada3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesJoseph Garner / Paul Sercer vs James Jackson / Nick Larsen6-3, 6-1
2024-02-29vs PTighe (Blakeney)Won 20
W#1 SinglesPaul Sercer vs Indranil Bhattacharya6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJoseph Garner / Kristoff Goson vs Darrin Theriault / Brian Hegner6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Paul Sercer
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.07
Nicholas Munn
published
3.05
Curtis Crews
published 3
2.95
Joseph Garner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.92
Kristoff Goson
published
2.88
Kenneth Godfrey
published
Curt Waldthausen
published 3
2.75
Kris Chapman
published
2.71
Jacob Colley
published
Jason Colgate
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenneth Godfrey + Joseph Garner5257% games+10.1% vs expected
Paul Sercer + Joseph Garner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Paul Sercer
38W–29L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
Nicholas Munn
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Curtis Crews
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Joseph Garner
48W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.95
Kristoff Goson
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
Kenneth Godfrey
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Curt Waldthausen
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kris Chapman
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
William John McGough Jr.
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Jacob Colley
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jason Colgate
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.