Teams

Team Red West 40+6.0

2026 Baltimore Mixed 40 & Over · Baltimore Mixed 40 & Over 6.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-04-25vs Team Blue Iyer 40+6.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesJiashi Zhao / Brian Kuebler vs Seema Iyer / Mark Rossi6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChristine Hammann / Wayne Chesner vs Rosemary Harty / Mitch Guthall6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRebecca Harris / Michael West vs Carol Vidal / Faisal Hussain2-6, 0-6
2026-04-21vs Team Blue Iyer 40+6.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesXing Zu / Todd Zoren vs Carol Vidal / Mark Rossi4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSheri Mazurkevich / Wayne Chesner vs Kathleen Schaffner / Warren Hedgepeth3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCheryl Royce / Chip Desi vs Beth Bafford / Joe Eisenberg6-4, 6-2
2026-04-19vs Team Blue Iyer 40+6.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesXing Zu / Todd Zoren vs Beth Bafford / Joe Eisenberg6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDianna Sinofsky / Jeffrey Richman vs Allison Steinmetz / Jeffrey Balesh6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCheryl Royce / Wayne Chesner vs Aimee MacEda / Warren Hedgepeth6-1, 6-3
2026-04-16vs Team Blue Iyer 40+6.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesXing Zu / Wayne Chesner vs Aimee MacEda / Jeffrey Balesh7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDianna Sinofsky / Jeffrey Richman vs Lisa Shearer / Warren Hedgepeth7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Harris / Todd Zoren vs Andrea Smolen / Mitch Guthall6-1, 6-3
2026-04-12vs Team Blue Iyer 40+6.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesXing Zu / Wayne Chesner vs Kathleen Schaffner / Warren Hedgepeth6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristine Hammann / Chip Desi vs Allison Steinmetz / Jeffrey Balesh6-2, 7-6
2026-04-11vs Team Blue Iyer 40+6.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesGail Lawson / Jeffrey Richman vs Carol Vidal / Mitch Guthall3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Harris / Michael West vs Kathleen Schaffner / Warren Hedgepeth4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSheri Mazurkevich / Chip Desi vs Rosemary Harty / Jeffrey Balesh6-1, 6-4
2026-04-08vs Team Blue Iyer 40+6.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesXing Zu / Wayne Chesner vs Seema Iyer / Mitch Guthall6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristine Hammann / Michael West vs Andrea Smolen / Warren Hedgepeth6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSheri Mazurkevich / Jeffrey Richman vs Carol Vidal / Mark Rossi3-6, 2-6
2026-03-31vs Team Blue Iyer 40+6.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesGail Lawson / Todd Zoren vs Carol Vidal / Jeffrey Balesh7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJiashi Zhao / Brian Kuebler vs Beth Bafford / Joe Eisenberg5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCheryl Royce / Chip Desi vs Seema Iyer / Mark Rossi6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2026-03-28vs Team Blue Iyer 40+6.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesChristine Hammann / Todd Zoren vs Kathleen Schaffner / Joe Eisenberg6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJiashi Zhao / Brian Kuebler vs Lisa Shearer / Mitch Guthall6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDianna Sinofsky / Jeffrey Richman vs Rosemary Harty / Faisal Hussain6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Baltimore Mixed 40 & Over 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team Red West 40+6.063161125218
2Team Blue Iyer 40+6.036111636268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Cheryl Royce
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Brian Kuebler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Todd Zoren
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.80
Jeffrey Richman
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.80
Christine Hammann
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Dianna Sinofsky
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.53
Gail Lawson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.27
Chip Desi
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.24
Jiashi Zhao
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Michael West
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sheri Mazurkevich
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Wayne Chesner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Xing Zu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Kuebler + Jiashi Zhao213 matchesnot enough data
Dianna Sinofsky + Jeffrey Richman213 matchesnot enough data
Wayne Chesner + Xing Zu213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cheryl Royce
122W–139L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.08
3.5
Brian Kuebler
54W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.98
3
Todd Zoren
14W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Jeffrey Richman
4W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Christine Hammann
84W–47L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Dianna Sinofsky
43W–49L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Gail Lawson
2W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.53
2.5
Chip Desi
5W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
Jiashi Zhao
12W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.24
Michael West
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sheri Mazurkevich
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Wayne Chesner
4W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Xing Zu
3W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.