Teams

LOS GATOS SR 18AW4.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.5

18 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-14vs BOB MCGUIRE PK18AW4.5BWon 10
W#1 DoublesKyoko Hubbard / Jeannine Roberts vs Manasa Gadde / Kristine Tan6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-20vs BOB MCGUIRE PK18AW4.5BWon 10
W#1 DoublesKyoko Hubbard / Adeeti Ullal vs Kathleen Qin / Samantha Herman6-4, 6-0
2025-04-07vs RINCONADA PK 18AW4.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesSilvana Gold / Kyoko Hubbard vs Sisine Mercado / Catherine Puzon5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Allison Bartlett
published 4.5
4.45
Denise Alberto
published 4.5
4.33
Paula Moser
published
Ayaka Zuverink
published 4.5
Geri Lamble
published 4.5
4.24
Kimberly Bridgford
published
4.22
Radhika Arora
published
4.21
Kyoko Hubbard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.21
Peggy Schatzman
published
4.18
Marybeth Gonzales
published
4.16
Tara Garneau
published
4.14
Denise Hartfield
published 4.5
4.12
Maisun Totah
published
4.05
Christine Dumery
published 4.5
4.05
Emese Erdos
published 4.5
4.04
Stefanie Bray
published
4.03
Donna Kaneko
published 4.5
3.91
Sophie Heerinckx
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tara Garneau + Denise Hartfield5163% gamesnot enough data
Denise Hartfield + Denise Alberto404 matchesnot enough data
Sophie Heerinckx + Peggy Schatzman123 matchesnot enough data
Maisun Totah + Donna Kaneko123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allison Bartlett
20W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
4.58
4.5
Denise Alberto
18W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
4.45
Paula Moser
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
4.33
4.5
Ayaka Zuverink
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Geri Lamble
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Bridgford
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
Radhika Arora
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.22
Kyoko Hubbard
14W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
4.21
Peggy Schatzman
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
4.21
Marybeth Gonzales
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
4.18
Tara Garneau
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Denise Hartfield
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
4.14
Maisun Totah
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Christine Dumery
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
4.05
4.5
Emese Erdos
17W–20L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
Stefanie Bray
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.04
4.5
Donna Kaneko
9W–27L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
4.03
Sophie Heerinckx
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.