Teams

MIT Singles Team 1 - Women

Adult 18 & Over MIT Outdoor Singles League · 4.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-31vs MIT Singles Team 2 - WomenLost 01
L#1 SinglesArden Lee vs Amity Eaton3-6, 1-5
2026-07-24vs MIT Singles Team 2 - WomenWon 10
W#1 SinglesNaomi Zarrilli vs Emily Glass6-1, 2-5
2026-06-26vs MIT Singles Team 2 - WomenLost 01
L#1 SinglesArden Lee vs Marie Payton4-6, 4-1
2026-06-12vs MIT Singles Team 2 - WomenLost 01
L#1 SinglesArden Lee vs Marina Momot3-6, 1-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MIT Singles Team 1 - Women000000
2MIT Singles Team 2 - Women000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Alexandria Mar
published 4
3.87
Emily Shuman
published
3.82
Arden Lee
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.27
Nikki Gauthier
published
Naomi Zarrilli
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alexandria Mar
18W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
4.00
Emily Shuman
60W–38L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Arden Lee
12W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Nikki Gauthier
100W–55L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Naomi Zarrilli
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.