Teams

ROUND HILL CC 40AW3.5B

2023 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
L#1 DoublesChristi Deakin / Jennifer Davis vs Tammy Fox / Heather Houston0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Davis / Jill Petersen vs Robin Hultgren / Shauntae Morris0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Wendy Gulden
published
3.63
Viviana Meyer
published
3.36
Camille Schulz
published 4
3.32
Allene Rognon
published 3.5
3.30
Cecily Barclay
published 3.5
3.29
Shawn Young
published
3.27
Yolla Elahmadie
published
3.27
Suzanne Peck
published
3.22
Jennifer Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Nanny Tunnell
published
3.17
Kerry Marx
published
3.14
Trish Nornhold
published
3.13
Lea Baldacci
published
3.02
Christi Deakin
published 3.5
Jana Vojdani
published
Julie Peloquin
published
Rachel Gilchrist
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shawn Young + Trish Nornhold224 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Gilchrist + Trish Nornhold033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wendy Gulden
15W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%13%87%
3.65
Viviana Meyer
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.63
4
Camille Schulz
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
3.36
3.5
Allene Rognon
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Cecily Barclay
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Shawn Young
21W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
Yolla Elahmadie
5W–17L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Suzanne Peck
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Jennifer Davis
49W–61L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Nanny Tunnell
4W–15L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Kerry Marx
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.17
Trish Nornhold
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.14
Lea Baldacci
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Christi Deakin
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.02
Jana Vojdani
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Peloquin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachel Gilchrist
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.