Teams

Gimme A Break

2025 COMBO · 8.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-13vs JNCC UriarteWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Danielson / Elizabeth Flint vs Jennifer Growcock / Virginia Raborn6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelody DuPerier / Kathryn Roohan vs Mallery Bourquin / Vicki Contreras1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Price / Constance Hassan vs Kelsey Altgelt / Samantha Kadish6-4, 6-4
2025-04-12vs Combo ChicasLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelody DuPerier / Nicole Saviez vs Lynn Wilson / Kirstin Clark0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKathryn Roohan / Sandy Collier vs Bridget Noack / Linh Nguyen0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Flint / Constance Hassan vs Joy Meltzer / Veronica Flores3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-12vs JNCC UriarteWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Danielson / Constance Hassan vs Kailey Jonas / Samantha Kadish5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Flint / Maria Chase vs Kelsey Altgelt / Vicki Contreras6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNancy Price / Nicole Saviez vs Kathy Uriarte / Kristine Pak6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-11vs Combo ChicasLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelody DuPerier / Elizabeth Flint vs Catherine Babbitt / Kirstin Clark7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathryn Roohan / Sandy Collier vs Joy Meltzer / Paula Decas0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKathryn Lemons / Susan Danielson vs Julie Wiernik / Veronica Flores5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Kathryn Lemons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.05
Melody DuPerier
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.85
Maria Chase
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Susan Danielson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Kathryn Roohan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Constance Hassan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Nicole Saviez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.52
Sandy Collier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Roohan + Sandy Collier101440% games−1.3% vs expected
Susan Danielson + Kathryn Lemons123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn Lemons
3W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.13
Melody DuPerier
6W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
4.05
Maria Chase
19W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
3.85
Susan Danielson
18W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Kathryn Roohan
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
3.56
4
Constance Hassan
9W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
Nicole Saviez
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Sandy Collier
11W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.