Teams

MTC - Brackett 55+ 6.5

2026 Combo 55 & Over Men Night - Mobile · 6.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-14vs MTC - Denson 6.5 55+Won 30
W#1 DoublesAndy Falls / Gerard Weinacker vs Aaron Long / Edward G McDermott6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Lindsey / Kristian Deaver vs John Davis / Jeffrey Denson6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTim White / Mark Boyles vs Larry Marcrum / Matt Singleton7-6, 6-2
2026-07-07vs MTC - Denson 6.5 55+Won 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Hamner / Earl Mckinnell vs John Davis / Michael Brown6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAndy Falls / Odie van Devender vs Larry Marcrum / Kerry Cannon7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGerard Weinacker / Rick Thompson vs Aaron Long / Edward G McDermott6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2026-06-30vs MTC - Denson 6.5 55+Won 30
W#1 DoublesWyllys More / Mark Swanzy vs Daniel Huben / Larry Marcrum6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAndy Falls / Kevin Conrey vs Jeffrey Denson / Aaron Long6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTim White / Brandon Jackson vs George May / Matt Singleton6-2, 6-2
2026-06-23vs MTC - Denson 6.5 55+Won 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Hamner / Kristian Deaver vs John Davis / James Drake6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesOdie van Devender / Rick Thompson vs Edward G McDermott / Aaron Long6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMark Swanzy / Louie Brackett vs Larry Marcrum / Michael Brown1-6, 4-6
2026-06-16vs MTC - Denson 6.5 55+Won 30
W#1 DoublesKevin Conrey / Michael Hamner vs James Drake / Jeffrey Denson6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMark Boyles / Rick Thompson vs Daniel Huben / Kerry Cannon7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesBrian Lindsey / Mark Swanzy vs Matt Singleton / George May6-3, 6-4
2026-06-09vs MTC - Denson 6.5 55+Won 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Hamner / Mark Boyles vs Daniel Huben / John Davis7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEarl Mckinnell / Wyllys More vs Jeffrey Denson / Larry Marcrum6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBrandon Jackson / Tim White vs Aaron Long / Kevin Wood6-2, 6-2
2026-06-02vs MTC - Denson 6.5 55+Won 30
W#1 DoublesKristian Deaver / Michael Hamner vs John Davis / James Drake6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesWyllys More / Odie van Devender vs Edward G McDermott / Kevin Wood6-1, 3-1
W#3 DoublesRick Thompson / Earl Mckinnell vs Kerry Cannon / Matt Singleton6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MTC - Brackett 55+ 6.5701924114
2MTC - Denson 6.5 55+0721939250

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Michael Hamner
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.43
Brian Lindsey
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Andy Falls
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.18
Wyllys More
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Kristian Deaver
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Odie van Devender
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Kevin Conrey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Earl Mckinnell
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Brandon Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Tim White
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Louie Brackett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Mark Boyles
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Gerard Weinacker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.62
Mark Swanzy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim White + Odie van Devender12265% games+10.6% vs expected
Odie van Devender + Earl Mckinnell14367% games+8.1% vs expected
Tim White + Kristian Deaver314 matchesnot enough data
Tim White + Mark Boyles303 matchesnot enough data
Brian Lindsey + Andy Falls303 matchesnot enough data
Kristian Deaver + Earl Mckinnell213 matchesnot enough data
Kristian Deaver + Andy Falls303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Hamner
45W–20L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Brian Lindsey
32W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Andy Falls
21W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Wyllys More
6W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.18
Kristian Deaver
49W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.13
Odie van Devender
58W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.09
Kevin Conrey
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
Earl Mckinnell
32W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.06
3.5
Brandon Jackson
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
Tim White
32W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Louie Brackett
25W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
Mark Boyles
36W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
Gerard Weinacker
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Mark Swanzy
6W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.