Teams

Court Junkies

2026 Mixed 18 and Over League · 9.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.17 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-15vs LululamonLost 02
L#1 DoublesCatherine Hall / Chan Ly vs Steven Nguyen / Rachel Karlin1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJustin Locke / Deanna DiBiase vs Berylin Lau / Austin Wines4-6, 4-6
2026-04-04vs Drink-Play-Eat-Repeat 9.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesChan Ly / Catherine Hall vs Chad Shibuya / Malorie Murakami2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJustin Locke / Deanna DiBiase vs Berylin Lau / Nate Geigle0-6, 3-6
2026-03-27vs LululamonLost 02
L#1 DoublesJustin Locke / Mona Decrinis vs Austin Wines / Hana Yoshikawa1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTetsu Anan / Emily Collins vs Rachel Karlin / Patrick da Silva2-6, 5-7
2026-03-13vs LululamonLost 03
L#1 DoublesCharlie Crandall / Caroline Gammie vs Austin Wines / Hana Yoshikawa3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDeanna DiBiase / Tetsu Anan vs Steven Nguyen / Rachel Karlin3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJustin Locke / Karen Sullivan vs Jennifer Wood / Andrew Yoon3-6, 0-6
2026-03-13vs LululamonLost 03
L#1 DoublesJerry Delacruz / Mona Decrinis vs Patrick da Silva / Hana Yoshikawa3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPetra Dupont / Tetsu Anan vs Andrew Yoon / Rachel Karlin3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJustin Locke / Deanna DiBiase vs Jennifer Wood / Nate Geigle2-6, 3-6
2026-03-04vs LululamonLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Hall / Chan Ly vs Hana Yoshikawa / Steven Nguyen5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Collins / Jerry Delacruz vs Andrew Yoon / Rachel Karlin2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJustin Locke / Caroline Gammie vs Jennifer Wood / Nate Geigle1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lululamon60180283
2Court Junkies0601836216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Chan Ly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Caroline Gammie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.14
Charlie Crandall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
4.04
Petra Dupont
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.92
Karen Sullivan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.90
Deanna DiBiase
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.83
Jerry Delacruz
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.73
Mona Decrinis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.60
Catherine Hall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.30
Emily Collins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Justin Locke
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Malorie Murakami
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Tetsu Anan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Hall + Chan Ly0633% gamesnot enough data
Deanna DiBiase + Charlie Crandall3354% gamesnot enough data
Malorie Murakami + Justin Locke4162% gamesnot enough data
Mona Decrinis + Charlie Crandall134 matchesnot enough data
Deanna DiBiase + Justin Locke033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chan Ly
14W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Caroline Gammie
72W–42L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
4.22
4
Charlie Crandall
52W–47L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
4.14
4
Petra Dupont
103W–66L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
4.04
Karen Sullivan
37W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Deanna DiBiase
144W–107L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Jerry Delacruz
126W–98L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Mona Decrinis
103W–125L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Catherine Hall
144W–172L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.60
4.5
Emily Collins
48W–31L career · 6 lines in 2026
>99%<1%0%
3.30
Justin Locke
57W–39L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Malorie Murakami
101W–58L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tetsu Anan
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.