Teams

Ma.Basil40C

2025 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 5.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-10vs Me.McCaskill40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesAshley Knowles / Tina Santospago vs Julie Shaw / CarolAnn Wiggs6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAmanda Falsone / Noelle Hagen vs Meredith McCaskill / Helen Morisey6-3, 6-2
2025-10-07vs An.Pershke40CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTina Santospago / Ashley Knowles vs Tina Jones / Janie Morgan5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNoelle Hagen / Amy Holman vs Karen Bornhofen / Amy Cantando2-6, 2-6
2025-09-16vs El.Nixon40CWon 10
W#1 DoublesNoelle Hagen / Ashley Knowles vs Lauren Daigle / Melanie Frost6-4, 6-2
2025-09-09vs Ka.Blume40CWon 10
W#1 DoublesAshley Knowles / Tina Santospago vs Priscilla Nanney / Randi Rosen6-3, 6-1
2025-09-02vs An.Pershke40CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTina Santospago / Ashley Knowles vs Kathleen Malik / Brandy Vannoy6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNoelle Hagen / Amanda Mullen vs Katherine Rostick / Janie Morgan6-0, 5-7, 0-1
2025-08-26vs Me.McCaskill40CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTina Santospago / Amanda Falsone vs Julie Shaw / Bess Pitt7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNoelle Hagen / Amanda Mullen vs Merrit Lumsden / Sarah Sims Chesson6-4, 6-3
2025-08-26vs La.Kilpatrick40CWon 10
W#2 DoublesTina Santospago / Ashley Knowles vs Amanda Viele / Heather Caracio6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Noelle Hagen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.89
Ashley Knowles
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.79
Amanda Mullen
published 3
2.76
Mary Basil
published
Erika Martin
published 3
2.73
Tina Santospago
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.44
Amanda Falsone
published 3
1.95
Jennifer Cecconi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Basil + Amanda Mullen6258% games+11.5% vs expected
Tina Santospago + Ashley Knowles9556% games+5.5% vs expected
Noelle Hagen + Mary Basil3455% games+4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Noelle Hagen
24W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.96
3
Ashley Knowles
18W–9L career · type S · 6 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Amanda Mullen
18W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
Mary Basil
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Erika Martin
0W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Tina Santospago
51W–74L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Amanda Falsone
2W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44
Jennifer Cecconi
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.