Teams

KRA Kirkeby

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.17 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-14vs Westwood Caudill WKDAYWon 40
W#1 DoublesAnnie Turner / Kindra Kirkeby vs Samantha Wetzel / Katherine Singleton6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLindsay Daniel / Sarah Huss vs Allison Rosen / Donna Dean6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAmanda Stoneburner vs Ashley Sommardahl6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAnne Walker / Angela Kennedy vs Jana Chesley / Elizabeth Brogan2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-12vs ACAC tennis tiaras - GrangerWon 40
W#1 DoublesAshley Page / Elizabeth Williams vs Mary Follis / Meredith Saunders6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesAmanda Stoneburner vs Emma Peskind6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHeather DeBolt / Ginny Boland vs Jackie Granger / Sabrina Henderson6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Kilberg / Rachel Prusek vs Beverly Davis / Nancy Yglesias6-3, 6-1
2025-06-10vs Westwood JamersonWon 41
W#1 DoublesGinny Boland / Kindra Kirkeby vs Jessica Parrent / Caley Wilson7-6, 4-3
L#1 SinglesAnnie Turner vs Erin Sheridan6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMandy Miller / Sarah Huss vs Mary Douglas Rice / Meg Phillips6-0, 7-6
W#2 SinglesAmanda Stoneburner vs Virginia Jamerson7-6, 5-2
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Kilberg / Heather DeBolt vs Emily Layman / Erin Hyde6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Ginny Boland
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Camp August
published 3.5
3.12
Annie Turner
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Lindsay Daniel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Amanda Stoneburner
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.96
Kindra Kirkeby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Sarah Huss
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Rachel Prusek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Elizabeth Kilberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Ashley Page
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Angela Kennedy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Heather DeBolt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.68
Mandy Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Anne Walker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Daniel + Sarah Huss3350% games+2.5% vs expected
Annie Turner + Ginny Boland224 matchesnot enough data
Heather DeBolt + Lindsay Daniel303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ginny Boland
34W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Camp August
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Annie Turner
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Lindsay Daniel
29W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Amanda Stoneburner
16W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Kindra Kirkeby
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
Sarah Huss
36W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Rachel Prusek
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Elizabeth Kilberg
19W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Ashley Page
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Angela Kennedy
6W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Heather DeBolt
23W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Mandy Miller
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Anne Walker
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.