← Teams

MAC-Craven

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.7 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
June Kim
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
—
Susie Jansky
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.24
Dana McKillop
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Diana Callaway
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Amanda Lowthian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Katy Marcy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 0
Results5 ties
2020-02-29Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJill Craven / June Kim vs Kari Martin / Cathryn Hansen6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDiana Callaway / Margot Wolfsehr vs Rise Hawley / Misty Bettis6-1, 2-0
W#3 DoublesSusie Jansky / Kim Wright vs Nenette Olson / Marje Ferek6-4, 7-6
2020-02-16Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesDiana Callaway / Margot Wolfsehr vs Ellen Bowman / Kara Gajowskyj6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSamantha Esmer / Amanda Lowthian vs Angie Lee / Dongju Won6-1, 6-2
2020-02-01Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMargot Wolfsehr / Diana Callaway vs Jessica Miller / Mary Lowblad4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJill Craven / June Kim vs Annette Garske / Monica Rivares6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDana McKillop / Katy Marcy vs Michele Heinrichson / Heike Droste6-3, 6-3
2020-01-18Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesKim Wright / Susie Jansky vs Brandy Horwitz / Kirsten Giacomini6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDana McKillop / Katy Marcy vs Andrea Findley / Jessica Khalili6-3, 6-4
2020-01-05Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesJill Craven / June Kim vs Katie Windsor / Keely Kopetz4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Roberts / Katy Marcy vs Marie Picard / Jerilyn Hanson1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiana Callaway / Sarah Grewe vs Christy Grisham / Mary Klinger6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
June Kim
20W–16L career
not enough data
—
4
Susie Jansky
53W–45L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Dana McKillop
23W–65L career
1%98%0%
3.24
3.5
Diana Callaway
7W–35L career
13%87%0%
3.12
3.5
Amanda Lowthian
17W–39L career
13%87%0%
3.10
0
Katy Marcy
28W–21L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.