Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Day

2023 Winter League-Saturday · 4.0W Saturday

10 players · average NTRP 3.92 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-25vs Sports Mall-Adams/AffleckLost 01
L#1 DoublesClaire McNulty / Tina Marriott vs Anji DowDell / Brooklyn DowDell4-6, 5-3, 0-1
2023-03-18vs Wasatch Hills-KastelerLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaggie Rios / Mae Alexander vs Christine Fotheringham / Julie Cooley1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesClaire McNulty / Sophie Jackson vs Jodie Monson / Jordyn Parry2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesElaine Day / Sofia Hayes vs Sherilyn Rawlings / Lauren Rawlings0-6, 1-6
2023-03-11vs Liberty Park Tennis-Knight/TaylorLost 01
L#1 DoublesSofia Hayes / Sarah Nielson vs Elizabeth Vigil / Sidney van Tussenbrook4-6, 1-5
2023-03-04vs Cottonwood Club-BriesacherLost 02
L#1 DoublesWhitney Fautin / Tina Marriott vs Adrienne Davis / Christine Littleford4-6, 3-5
L#2 DoublesSofia Hayes / Sarah Nielson vs Kim Levine / Janice Smith2-6, 5-2, 0-1
2023-02-25vs Ivory Ridge-Smith/AllenWon 10
W#1 DoublesSofia Hayes / Sarah Nielson vs Sharlene Enloe / Lisa Bullington6-4, 6-5
2023-02-11vs Sports Mall-Adams/AffleckLost 12
W#1 DoublesMaggie Rios / Whitney Fautin vs Kristel Affleck / Mandy Berg2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesClaire McNulty / Mae Alexander vs Crystel Fox / Alyson Ellis1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSofia Hayes / Elaine Day vs Stacie Johnson / Michelle Edwards1-6, 1-6
2023-02-04vs Wasatch Hills-KastelerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTina Marriott / Sarah Nielson vs Regina Johnson / Julie Cooley7-5, 4-0
L#2 DoublesClaire McNulty / Maggie Rios vs Teisa Linscott / Lindsay Knight1-6, 4-6
2023-01-28vs Liberty Park Tennis-Knight/TaylorSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMaggie Rios / Sofia Hayes vs Elizabeth Vigil / Sidney van Tussenbrook2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesClaire McNulty / Sarah Nielson vs Emily Benton / Gretel Sampson4-6, 5-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Whitney Fautin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Kat Fuller
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Mae Alexander
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.71
Tina Marriott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Jennifer Sampson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Claire McNulty
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
2.63
Elaine Day
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Maggie Rios
published
Sofia Hayes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sophie Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Marriott + Claire McNulty5455% games+5.1% vs expected
Elaine Day + Tina Marriott224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Whitney Fautin
191W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
4.26
4
Kat Fuller
131W–95L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
Mae Alexander
59W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%2%98%
3.78
4
Tina Marriott
40W–42L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Jennifer Sampson
209W–141L career · 6 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Claire McNulty
39W–51L career · 5 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.46
3
Elaine Day
123W–244L career · 9 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
Maggie Rios
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sofia Hayes
14W–20L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sophie Jackson
7W–9L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.