Teams

FLYHS MEEHAN

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-29vs MEMPK VIEIRAWon 31
W#1 DoublesKathy Eaton / Sarah Vanderbeck vs Stacey Self / Brittany Johnson6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNancy Meehan vs Maggie Knotek6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoy Barthelmes / Megghan St Aubyn vs Beatriz Arsuaga / Teresa Jackson6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTara Clawson / Tara Williams vs Alexandra Dickinson / Teresa Vieira1-6, 2-6
2026-05-18vs FHCS PRIESTLost 23
W#1 DoublesKathy Eaton / Sarah Vanderbeck vs Catherine Roosevelt / Ashley Boehm6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesNancy Meehan vs Jessica Daniels2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnn Smith / Joy Barthelmes vs Beth Scutellaro / Barbara Francklyn2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesTara Williams vs Lorna Gutierrez1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMegghan St Aubyn / Tricia Campbell vs Sara Ballard / Jenny Malmgren6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-11vs CSCC DAVISWon 32
W#1 DoublesKathy Eaton / Sarah Vanderbeck vs Julie Davis / Lisa Smith6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesNancy Meehan vs Trudi Jackson4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTricia Campbell / Tara Clawson vs Colleen Miller / Kris Quinones6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMegghan St Aubyn vs Sherri Butler2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJoy Barthelmes / Ann Smith vs Leslee Bray / Holly Doyle7-6, 6-2
2026-05-04vs CCOC MCBRIDELost 14
L#1 DoublesSarah Vanderbeck / Kathy Eaton vs Cody Ross / Kelly Sung2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTricia Campbell vs Michelle Erlander2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJoy Barthelmes / Nancy Meehan vs Lindsay Bagby / Lydia Zach6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTara Williams vs Nicole Hurt2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Smith / Tara Clawson vs Sarah Jones Martinez / Missy Ross1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-04-27vs CSRC BRENNERLost 23
W#1 DoublesKathy Eaton / Sarah Vanderbeck vs Kristina Kyle / Karen Newton6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTara Williams vs Andrea Pazdera6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Meehan / Megghan St Aubyn vs Jamie Horspool / Joy Carroll1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAnn Smith vs Shawnee Brenner0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTara Clawson / Tricia Campbell vs Carol Young / Coretta Russell3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-20vs MEMPK VIEIRALost 23
L#1 DoublesJoy Barthelmes / Megghan St Aubyn vs Stacey Self / Brittany Johnson5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNancy Meehan vs Maggie Knotek6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKathy Eaton / Sarah Vanderbeck vs Sarah Yankowski / Alexandra Dickinson4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesTara Williams vs Lisa Pennino5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTara Clawson / Ann Smith vs Beatriz Arsuaga / Jessica Langley6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-13vs FHCS PRIESTLost 14
L#1 DoublesJoy Barthelmes / Nancy Meehan vs Alyssa Priest / Catherine Roosevelt5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Vanderbeck vs Lorna Gutierrez4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTricia Campbell / Tara Clawson vs Lyn Reeder / Beth Scutellaro4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesKathy Eaton vs Judy Custine6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAnn Smith / Tara Williams vs Ashley Boehm / Sara Ballard1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Sarah Vanderbeck
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
2.81
Kathy Eaton
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
2.79
Tricia Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Amy Rosewater
published 3
2.73
Joy Barthelmes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Nancy Meehan
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.61
Megghan St Aubyn
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.42
Tara Clawson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.37
Tara Williams
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.24
Ann Smith
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Vanderbeck + Kathy Eaton17858% games+1.8% vs expected
Megghan St Aubyn + Joy Barthelmes3351% games+0.2% vs expected
Tara Clawson + Tara Williams0537% games−3.0% vs expected
Tara Clawson + Tricia Campbell4546% games−5.8% vs expected
Tara Clawson + Ann Smith134 matchesnot enough data
Ann Smith + Tara Williams123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Vanderbeck
35W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.94
Kathy Eaton
25W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.81
Tricia Campbell
29W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Amy Rosewater
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Joy Barthelmes
27W–35L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Nancy Meehan
27W–26L career · 7 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
Megghan St Aubyn
4W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.61
Tara Clawson
21W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.42
Tara Williams
3W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
2.37
2.5
Ann Smith
10W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.