Teams

Women's holding area

2022 Holding League · Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Women's holding area000000
2Women's holding area B000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Linda Fillmore
published
3.73
Jordyn Parry
published 4
3.59
Jennifer Sampson
published 4
Angela Boyden
published 3.5
Carrie Larsen
published 3
2.45
Shauna Peterson
published 3
2.12
Trena Anderson
published
Sarah Berkowitz
published
Valine Vikari
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shauna Peterson + Valine Vikari3738% games−7.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Fillmore
101W–63L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.75
4
Jordyn Parry
168W–127L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Jennifer Sampson
208W–140L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Angela Boyden
15W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Carrie Larsen
38W–39L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Shauna Peterson
50W–84L career · type A · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.45
Trena Anderson
40W–51L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Sarah Berkowitz
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Valine Vikari
21W–39L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.