Teams

Thornton 55s 7.5W Combo Fri AM

2026 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women 55 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-28vs Barnes 55s 7.5W Combo Fri AMLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Jane Tarver / Janet Nicol vs Leah Price / Julianne Shamburg6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNancy McCoy / Pamela Rosendale vs Dell Barbee / April McAfee2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Fowler / Vicky Bethel vs Cheryl Bock / Alicia Brewer6-7, 4-6
W#1 DoublesDebbie Shiflet / Janet Nicol vs Paige Yates / Kelli Young4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTeresa Dail / Mary Fowler vs Annie Chapman / Judy Thomas6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnne Thornton / Jane Davenport vs Stacey Dennehy / Kim Hunt2-6, 3-6
2026-08-14vs Hughes 55s 7.5W Combo Fri AMLost 12
W#1 DoublesDebbie Shiflet / Janet Nicol vs Pam McAmis / Kathryn Michaud6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJane Davenport / Janis Beshears vs Judy Eaton / Lynda Pegram3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesGwenda Priest / Teresa Dail vs Kathy Pace / Theresa Atchison1-6, 5-7
2026-08-07vs Fogleman 55s 7.5 Combo W Fri AMLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanet Nicol / Mary Jane Tarver vs Martha Fogleman / Elaine Fox6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJanis Beshears / Pamela Rosendale vs Deanna Rouse / Jill Fritz3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJody Susong / Jane Davenport vs Debbie Clancy / Teresa Tolin6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2026-07-31vs Salata 55s 7.5W Combo Fri AMWon 21
L#1 DoublesMary Fowler / Jody Susong vs Kimberly Salata / Betty Kramer2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMary Jane Tarver / Teresa Dail vs Debbie Burgess / Dawn Frank6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnne Thornton / Nancy McCoy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 7.5 Women 55 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Majestic 55s 7.5 Combo Mon PM3081462
2Fogleman 55s 7.5 Combo W Fri AM31841184
3Biaggi 55s 7.5W Combo Mon PM2051657
4Harris/Womack 55s 7.5W Combo Mon Fri AM2163667
5Hughes 55s 7.5W Combo Fri AM2154979
6Barnes 55s 7.5W Combo Fri AM21541183
7Thornton 55s 7.5W Combo Fri AM12451074
8Chance 55s 7.5W Combo Mon PM0103636
9Craig/Berreth 55s 7.5W Combo Mon PM02151060
10Kroeger/Satterfield 55s 7.5W Combo Mon PM02151170
11Salata 55s 7.5W Combo Fri AM0421020127

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Pamela Rosendale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Janet Nicol
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Mary Jane Tarver
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Mary Fowler
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Gwenda Priest
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Mary Ann Nixon
published
3.29
Debbie Shiflet
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Vicky Bethel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Anne Thornton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Teresa Dail
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Jody Susong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Janis Beshears
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Cindy McElreath
published 3.5
2.91
Nancy McCoy
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Fowler + Mary Ann Nixon1638% gamesnot enough data
Janis Beshears + Jody Susong2344% gamesnot enough data
Mary Jane Tarver + Janet Nicol404 matchesnot enough data
Vicky Bethel + Mary Fowler033 matchesnot enough data
Mary Fowler + Jody Susong123 matchesnot enough data
Mary Ann Nixon + Gwenda Priest123 matchesnot enough data
Anne Thornton + Janis Beshears033 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Shiflet + Cindy McElreath123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamela Rosendale
11W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
Janet Nicol
13W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
Mary Jane Tarver
20W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
Mary Fowler
67W–79L career · 3 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
3.38
Gwenda Priest
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.38
Mary Ann Nixon
35W–46L career · no lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
3.35
3.5
Debbie Shiflet
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Vicky Bethel
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
94%6%<1%
3.29
3.5
Anne Thornton
16W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Teresa Dail
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Jody Susong
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
Janis Beshears
4W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.00
3.5
Cindy McElreath
4W–8L career · no lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.92
Nancy McCoy
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.