Teams

Naples Grande - Carran

2023 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 7.5 Combo 50 & over Men Spring

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-30vs COLLIER /Mintz/Combo50&Over7.5MWon 10
W#2 DoublesJames Foley / Robert Folger vs Rodger Heaton / Eric Smuda6-3
2023-05-16vs Village Walk Bonita - Van AlstineWon 10
W#2 DoublesJames Foley / Robert Folger vs Raymond Dobbins / Jonathan Hyland6-2, 6-2
2023-05-09vs Fiddlers Creek - D.KeelyLost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Foley / Tom Haas vs James Digeronimo / David Ray2-6, 2-6
2023-04-25vs COLLIER /Mintz/Combo50&Over7.5MLost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Foley / William Hospodor vs Dan Latendre / Donald Scanlon1-6, 1-6
2023-04-18vs Isles Of Collier - C. YoungWon 10
W#2 DoublesJames Foley / William Hospodor vs Steve Gapp / Rick Hazan6-0, 6-3
2023-04-11vs Village Walk Bonita - Van AlstineLost 02
L#1 DoublesJames Foley / William Hospodor vs Hank Brenner / Chad McAlpin6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLewis Carran / Ed Kokkila vs Raymond Dobbins / Jonathan Hyland4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-04-04vs Fiddlers Creek - D.KeelySplit 11
L#1 DoublesJames Foley / Tom Haas vs James Digeronimo / Joseph Kardek5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLewis Carran / Ed Kokkila vs David Keely / David Ray6-3, 7-6
2023-03-28vs Cambier - PackoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJames Foley / Tom Haas vs Greg Donahue / David Revette2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Diettrich / Ed Kokkila vs John Franta / John King6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 50 & over Men Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Fred Weinman
published
3.73
Thomas Hirsch
published
3.50
Robert Folger
published
Daniel Mihalik
published 3.5
Ed Kokkila
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
James Foley
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Lewis Carran
published
Todd Bergstrom
published
Tom Haas
published
William Hospodor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lewis Carran + Robert Folger213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Fred Weinman
21W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.94
Thomas Hirsch
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Robert Folger
34W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Daniel Mihalik
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ed Kokkila
77W–75L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
James Foley
126W–72L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lewis Carran
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Todd Bergstrom
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tom Haas
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
William Hospodor
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.