Teams

HBSQ-McDowell

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.43 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-19vs CAC/SL-SharmaLost 13
L#1 DoublesCameron McDowell / Peter Reni vs Chris Franks / Kevin Schmidt1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBret Matysik / Hunter Nelson vs Rohit Sharma / David Bibbs6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMichael Tieu vs John Ford0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesIan David / Jack Bong vs Will Blanchard / Victor Betancourt3-6, 6-7
2021-06-12vs BC-ChenWon 41
W#1 DoublesCameron McDowell / Brad McGinnis vs Rodney Jeffers / Andrew Ygona6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJeff Scott vs Benjamin Killey6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesHunter Nelson / Jamie Wright vs Mario Lopez / Alex Chen6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesBen Silber vs Aaron Song6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJeff McKatims / Ian David vs Thomas Anderson / Jeffrey Stoner6-1, 6-4
2021-06-05vs WSC-MurakiWon 40
W#1 DoublesCameron McDowell / Peter Reni vs Connor Vordale / Benjamin Chen6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJeff Scott vs Bond Minard6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJamie Wright / Brad McGinnis vs Mike Smolkowski / Mukund Soundararajan6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesIan David / Jeff McKatims vs Shreyas Sudarshan / Justin Kinney6-1, 7-6
2021-05-29vs AYTC (OUTDOORS) UenoLost 03
L#1 DoublesIan David / Peter Reni vs Donny Baugh / Michael Cheong0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBrad McGinnis vs Miles Lee2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTyler Gettmann / Bret Matysik vs Stefan Bach / Soap Ngeth2-6, 2-6
2021-05-21vs TCSP-LyLost 13
L#1 DoublesCameron McDowell / Peter Reni vs Mark Ball / Colin Turner5-7, 6-6
L#1 SinglesBrad McGinnis vs Nick Ketcham1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHunter Nelson / Jamie Wright vs Chris Casazza / Matthew Dannemiller2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJeff McKatims / Ian David vs Cheng Guo / Ian Turner6-2, 6-3
2021-05-15vs AYTC-NguyenWon 41
W#1 DoublesCameron McDowell / Peter Reni vs Eric Newman / Tim Giacometti6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJeff Scott vs Selcuk Basturk6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHunter Nelson / Jamie Wright vs Brandon Feldman / Roger Rogoff6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesBen Silber vs Ken Benoit2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBret Matysik / Brad McGinnis vs Ben Falk / Bindu Purhar3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-08vs MC-Bluesmen-MarkWon 40
W#1 DoublesCameron McDowell / Peter Reni vs Nickolay Tchervenski / Will Millar6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBrad McGinnis vs Akshay Kalyan6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHunter Nelson / Jamie Wright vs Edwin Tanumulia / Rodolfo Baba6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJeff Scott / Jeff McKatims vs Roger Mark / Nguyen Tong6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1AYTC (OUTDOORS) Ueno7026920226
2TCSP-Ly6126925255
3AYTC-Lu6126926270
4BETC-O'Donnell52231228283
5MI-Snail Pound-Glick52241129287
6WSC-Hu43191633274
7HBSQ-McDowell43191635288
8PSC-Smashers-Tortop25142150360
9WSC-Muraki25122352376
10AYTC-I’d Hit That-Purganan16122349354
11MC-Bluesmen-Mark16102555352

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Jeff Scott
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.30
Cameron McDowell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Brad McGinnis
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
Hunter Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Ben Silber
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.15
Jack Bong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Jeff McKatims
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.75
Joe Van Mieghem
published 4
Ian David
published
Michael Tieu
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Peter Reni
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tyler Gettmann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cameron McDowell + Peter Reni3259% games+1.9% vs expected
Cameron McDowell + Jack Bong213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Scott
15W–8L career · 4 lines in 2021
80%20%<1%
4.39
4.5
Cameron McDowell
73W–28L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Brad McGinnis
8W–8L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Hunter Nelson
17W–23L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Ben Silber
3W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Jack Bong
28W–33L career · 1 line in 2021
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Jeff McKatims
21W–27L career · 4 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
4.10
4
Joe Van Mieghem
16W–15L career · type A · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.75
Ian David
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Tieu
2W–18L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Peter Reni
8W–8L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tyler Gettmann
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.