Teams

Guillet/18's/3.0/COQ Night

2026 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Night

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-05Split 11
W#1 SinglesLisa Goodgion vs Lindsey Palmer6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Harty / Jennifer Jett vs Jennifer Sillars / Savannah Killebrew2-6, 4-6
2026-04-28Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLisa Goodgion vs Alexis Shih6-7, 0-6
2026-03-17Won 10
W#1 SinglesLisa Goodgion vs Samantha Karlin Dunaway6-3, 6-4
2026-03-10Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRebekah Springer / Cecilia Hanson vs Jessica Haley / Susan Nelson2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesLisa Goodgion vs Taylor Bouche0-6, 1-6
2026-03-03Split 11
L#1 DoublesRachel Schulingkamp / Cecilia Hanson vs Angela Palmisano / Lindsey Palmer3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLisa Goodgion vs Sophie Domingue6-4, 6-2
2026-02-25Won 10
W#3 DoublesCecilia Hanson / Rachel Schulingkamp vs Jenny Vitellaro / Catherine Davenport6-3, 7-5
2026-02-10Split 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer Jett / Jennifer Olivier vs Mary Grace Sherlock / SHELLY GALLARDO2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLisa Goodgion vs Patricia Borges6-1, 6-1
2026-02-03Split 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer Jett / Jennifer Harty vs Marilyn Keller / Ellen Sweetman1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLisa Goodgion vs Maite Cardoso6-0, 6-4
2026-01-20Won 10
W#1 SinglesLisa Goodgion vs Michelle Michaelis6-2, 6-1
2026-01-13Lost 01
L#2 SinglesLisa Goodgion vs Susan Nelson4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.65
Cecilia Hanson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Ana Munoz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Eryn Brannagan
usually #2 Doubles 70%, also #2 Singles 15% · published
Jaime Guillet
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
Jennifer Harty
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 37% · published
Jennifer Jett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Olivier
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 19% · published
Kacie Smith
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Lisa Goodgion
usually #1 Singles 89%, also #2 Singles 11% · published
Mary Leigh Fitzmorris
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Rachel Schulingkamp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 19% · published
Rebekah Springer
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
Soi Smith
usually #3 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jaime Guillet + Eryn Brannagan1537% gamesnot enough data
Soi Smith + Ana Munoz0534% gamesnot enough data
Soi Smith + Jennifer Olivier2341% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Harty + Eryn Brannagan044 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Jett + Jennifer Harty123 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Harty + Ana Munoz033 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Harty + Jennifer Olivier033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cecilia Hanson
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Ana Munoz
2W–12L career · type S · 14 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
Eryn Brannagan
13W–16L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jaime Guillet
8W–16L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Harty
4W–23L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Jett
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Olivier
5W–26L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kacie Smith
6W–1L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Goodgion
6W–3L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Leigh Fitzmorris
9W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rachel Schulingkamp
20W–7L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rebekah Springer
5W–6L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Soi Smith
3W–10L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.