Teams

SKY - Garrick

2021 Marion Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult Women 40 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-05-23vs Marion - FK/WattsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarti Little / Pamelia Payne vs Eileen Lombardo / Lisa Steed0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Petrea Coleman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-16vs FK - MacMurraySplit 11
L#1 DoublesSusan Garrick / Pamelia Payne vs Lori Croy / Valerie Elvin6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Lademann / Irma Buttermore vs Hollie Powell / Peggy Ray6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2021-05-15vs Marion - FK/WattsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLaura Flanagan / Pamelia Payne vs Lisa Degirolami / Amanda Miller6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Garrick / Anna Olejnik-Mirra vs Nicole Wigelsworth / Jennifer Boyd2-6, 1-6
2021-05-08vs FK - MacMurrayWon 10
W#3 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Mary Jeanne Walsh vs Amy Gibboney / Pamela Plumlee6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-02vs Marion - FK/WattsLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Garrick / Pamelia Payne vs Lisa Steed / Eileen Lombardo6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnna Olejnik-Mirra / Irma Buttermore vs Debby Watts / Jennifer Boyd1-6, 0-6
2021-04-25vs Marion - FK/WattsLost 02
L#1 SinglesSusan Garrick vs Eileen Lombardo1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Linda Lademann vs Jennifer Hewitson / Jennifer Boyd0-6, 1-6
2021-04-17vs FK - MacMurrayLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Garrick / Anna Olejnik-Mirra vs Lori Croy / Andrea Harden3-6, 4-6
2021-03-28vs FK - MacMurrayWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarti Little / Susan Garrick vs Pamela Plumlee / Hollie Powell7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesPamelia Payne vs Tina Shuman6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Heather Hagar
published 4
3.35
Mary Jeanne Walsh
published
3.25
Laura Flanagan
published
3.24
Irma Buttermore
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Linda Lademann
published
Pamelia Payne
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Petrea Coleman
published
Susan Garrick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamelia Payne + Irma Buttermore5941% gamesnot enough data
Laura Flanagan + Susan Garrick3548% gamesnot enough data
Laura Flanagan + Pamelia Payne134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Heather Hagar
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
Mary Jeanne Walsh
9W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.35
Laura Flanagan
30W–59L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Irma Buttermore
86W–80L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
Linda Lademann
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Pamelia Payne
36W–60L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Petrea Coleman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Garrick
52W–70L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.