Teams

Vitalie Stirbu M7.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS COMBO DOUBLES Weekend Event · M 7.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.20 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-24vs Matt Sisk M7.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesWah Jeung / Kevin Luong vs Matt Sisk / Ashwin Gaitonde6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDavis Huynh / Vignan Thumu vs Brian Kraft / Jason Edgerton6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesBeni Goldenberg / Kyle Richard vs John Roberts / Remy Fellman6-3, 6-1
2025-08-23vs Pedro Montalvo M7.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesWah Jeung / Kyle Richard vs Luis Parga / Pedro Montalvo6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesVignan Thumu / Davis Huynh vs Victor Fernandez / Cody Blanchard7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesBeni Goldenberg / Daniel Jean vs Christopher Hebert / Harish Rangarajan6-1, 6-2
2025-08-23vs Jordan Odulio M7.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesWah Jeung / Kyle Richard vs Jordan Odulio / Mark Nguyen6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCaden Lott / Ryan Wirtz vs Martin Wong / David Luu6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesVitalie Stirbu / Kevin Luong vs Gerard Odulio / James Vo3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for M 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Caden Lott
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.00
Beni Goldenberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.99
Dennis van Ham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Ryan Wirtz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Daniel Jean
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.33
Davis Huynh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Kyle Richard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Vignan Thumu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Vitalie Stirbu
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Wah Jeung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kyle Richard + Daniel Jean314 matchesnot enough data
Kyle Richard + Ryan Wirtz404 matchesnot enough data
Caden Lott + Vitalie Stirbu213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Caden Lott
23W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
4.15
4.5
Beni Goldenberg
15W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
4.00
4.5
Dennis van Ham
25W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.99
Ryan Wirtz
36W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.83
4
Daniel Jean
20W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.78
3.5
Davis Huynh
17W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Kyle Richard
44W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vignan Thumu
12W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vitalie Stirbu
18W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wah Jeung
19W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.