Teams

Stewart - RS Clay

2022 Escambia Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Combo 50 & Over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-11-20vs Wallace - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarl Miller / John Wimberly vs Andrew Hillman / Jeffrey Bryant6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-11-06vs Wallace - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrian Weil / John Wimberly vs Gordon Paulus / MICHAEL SEUZENEAU7-5, 6-3
2022-10-30vs Wallace - RS ClayLost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Calvin Moore vs Russell Ball / Ali Kizilbash4-6, 1-6
2022-10-23vs Wallace - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Weil / John Wimberly vs Jeffrey Bryant / Andrew Hillman6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 50 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Jason Struck
published
3.79
Brian Weil
published 4
3.74
Michael Yager
published
3.57
James Richardson
published 4
3.36
Eric Stewart
published 3.5
3.34
John Whittenberger
published
3.31
Calvin Moore
published 3.5
John Wimberly
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Shane Russell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Struck + Michael Yager1540% games−14.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Struck
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Brian Weil
7W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
Michael Yager
13W–12L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
James Richardson
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Eric Stewart
19W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
John Whittenberger
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Calvin Moore
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.31
John Wimberly
123W–97L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shane Russell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.