Teams

Lobsters 9.0

Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALLEGHENY MNTN.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-01vs OxfordLost 01
L#1 DoublesRafael Sevilla Serrano / Gary Dellovade vs Steve Hay / Lloyd Adams0-6, 2-6
2026-07-17vs OxfordLost 01
L#2 DoublesGary Dellovade / Rafael Sevilla Serrano vs Leet Sommerfeld / Robert Zgonc3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 9.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lobsters 9.0032715101

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Ed Townsend
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
John Heide
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.82
Rafael Sevilla Serrano
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.79
Gary Dellovade
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Frank Haley
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
John Thomas
published
Steven Haught
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frank Haley + John Heide5352% gamesnot enough data
Frank Haley + John Thomas4255% gamesnot enough data
Frank Haley + Steven Haught224 matchesnot enough data
Frank Haley + Ed Townsend213 matchesnot enough data
Ed Townsend + Steven Haught123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ed Townsend
60W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.96
John Heide
28W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.87
Rafael Sevilla Serrano
32W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Gary Dellovade
82W–47L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Frank Haley
117W–107L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
John Thomas
73W–31L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Steven Haught
37W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.