Teams

Hurd/Harris 18+ W23

2023 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Cindy Moe
published 3.5
3.35
Brigitte Schiller
published 3.5
3.27
Anna Rindt
published 3.5
3.26
Renee McCloden
published
3.26
Laura Abraham
published
3.21
Amy Haugen
published 3.5
3.19
Jacie Hurd
published 3.5
3.12
Catherine Carney
published 3.5
3.10
Sarah LeDoux
published
3.07
Kathy Burns
published
3.07
Marcia Harris
published
2.80
Yelena Yan
published
2.70
Judith Landrum
published
Kathleen Kennedy
published
Susan Stombaugh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Moe + Brigitte Schiller5257% games+6.3% vs expected
Kathy Burns + Sarah LeDoux5744% games+1.1% vs expected
Susan Stombaugh + Catherine Carney5449% games−3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindy Moe
33W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Brigitte Schiller
34W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Anna Rindt
22W–24L career · type A · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Renee McCloden
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
Laura Abraham
16W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Amy Haugen
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Jacie Hurd
23W–26L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Catherine Carney
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
Sarah LeDoux
15W–23L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
Kathy Burns
20W–24L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.07
Marcia Harris
16W–15L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.07
Yelena Yan
14W–28L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
Judith Landrum
1W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Kathleen Kennedy
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Stombaugh
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.