Teams

GR-Wuntke (18s 3.0M SP)

2026 Neuse River Adult 18 & Over League · 3.0 Men 18 & over

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-14vs GR-Baggett (18s 3.0M SP)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Thomas / Michael Kabler vs James Hardison / Greg Baggett7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTurner Provo vs Quentin Thigpen5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMark Wuntke / Brad Beissner vs Clifton Game / Terry Dawson6-2, 6-4
2026-04-07vs GR-Baggett (18s 3.0M SP)Split 11
L#1 DoublesMark Wuntke / Turner Provo vs James Hardison / Quentin Thigpen5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Kabler / Matlock Stocks vs Clifton Game / Richard Moye7-6, 6-1
2026-03-31vs GR-Baggett (18s 3.0M SP)Split 11
L#1 SinglesTurner Provo vs Greg Baggett2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBrad Beissner / Mark Wuntke vs James Hardison / Richard Moye6-3, 7-5
2026-03-26vs GR-Baggett (18s 3.0M SP)Split 11
W#1 DoublesMark Wuntke / Brad Beissner vs Clifton Game / Richard Moye6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMatlock Stocks vs Quentin Thigpen4-6, 3-6
2026-03-17vs GR-Baggett (18s 3.0M SP)Won 21
W#1 DoublesDavid Brown / Turner Provo vs Clifton Game / Richard Moye6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMatlock Stocks vs Terry Dawson6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDavid Thomas / Mark Wuntke vs Quentin Thigpen / James Hardison2-6, 3-6
2026-03-10vs GR-Baggett (18s 3.0M SP)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Wuntke / Matlock Stocks vs Greg Baggett / James Hardison0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesTurner Provo vs Quentin Thigpen3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesBrad Beissner / David Thomas vs Terry Dawson / Clifton Game3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Men 18 & over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GR-Baggett (18s 3.0M SP)3310818167
2GR-Wuntke (18s 3.0M SP)3381020167

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Turner Provo
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.92
Michael Kabler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Brad Beissner
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Matlock Stocks
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.48
Mark Wuntke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Kabler + Matlock Stocks123 matchesnot enough data
Mark Wuntke + Brad Beissner303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Turner Provo
6W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Michael Kabler
20W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Brad Beissner
11W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Matlock Stocks
15W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Mark Wuntke
8W–33L career · 6 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.