Teams

Escambia/Duncan/TriLevel4.5M

2024 Escambia Trilevel 18 & Over · 4.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.20 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-09vs Wallace - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesRobert Fabbro / Tyson Dunkelberger vs Kenneth Wallace / Craig Abel6-3, 6-1
2024-10-02vs Wallace - RS ClayWon 20
W#2 DoublesBrian Jordan / Kyle Ehlers vs Stephen McCrory / Gordon Paulus6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTyler Gross / Robert Fabbro vs Craig Abel / Nick Farkas6-2, 6-4
2024-09-25vs Wallace - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesZachary Schweigert / Brian Jordan vs Michael Richardson Jr / Cosme Barrios4-6, 4-6
2024-09-18vs Wallace - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesKyle Ehlers / Brian Jordan vs Michael Richardson Jr / Paul Einhart3-6, 2-6
2024-08-28vs Wallace - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesAlex Leonard / Robert Fabbro vs Nick Farkas / Ken McCurdy7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Stephen Baes
published
4.31
Brian Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.17
Brad Bradford
published 4.5
4.12
Mario Stramaglia
published
4.11
Kyle Ehlers
published
3.96
Josh Sitton
published
3.90
Ryan Duncan
published
3.80
Robert Fabbro
usually #1 Doubles 69%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
3.79
Curtis Abbott
published 4
3.67
Alex Leonard
published 4
3.41
JOHNNY DICKSON
published
3.17
Scott Antonio
published
Tyler Gross
published
Tyson Dunkelberger
published
Zachary Schweigert
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Jordan + Kyle Ehlers12267% games+3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephen Baes
16W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
4.48
4.5
Brian Jordan
99W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
4.31
4.5
Brad Bradford
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
4.17
Mario Stramaglia
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
4.12
Kyle Ehlers
40W–18L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.11
Josh Sitton
4W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.96
Ryan Duncan
13W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.90
Robert Fabbro
143W–78L career · 13 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Collin Perciballi
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Curtis Abbott
1W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Alex Leonard
12W–2L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
JOHNNY DICKSON
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
3.41
Scott Antonio
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Tyler Gross
10W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tyson Dunkelberger
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Zachary Schweigert
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.