Teams

Olde Towne (Elizabeth Rudder)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Low · 4.0 Low (Check Eligibility List)

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Low (Check Eligibility List) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Whitney Higuera
published
3.60
Pam Klingbeil
published
3.39
Dottie Maloy
published 3.5
3.36
Joan Nichols
published
3.25
Michelle Jericevich
published
Cheryl King
published 3.5
3.12
Renee Hackett
published
3.03
Missy Coy
published
Azita Zarrabi
published 3
Jane Dinnen
published
Jessica Sims
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dottie Maloy + Azita Zarrabi3352% gamesnot enough data
Joan Nichols + Pam Klingbeil134 matchesnot enough data
Joan Nichols + Michelle Jericevich123 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Jericevich + Azita Zarrabi123 matchesnot enough data
Renee Hackett + Azita Zarrabi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Whitney Higuera
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Pam Klingbeil
34W–35L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Dottie Maloy
28W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
Joan Nichols
27W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
Michelle Jericevich
10W–16L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Cheryl King
6W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Renee Hackett
29W–41L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
Missy Coy
15W–24L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Azita Zarrabi
20W–53L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jane Dinnen
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jessica Sims
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.