Teams

Escambia/Mcelhany/Mixed18&Over7.0

2023 Escambia Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.71 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-08-16vs Shaffer - PCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRobert Fabbro / Elizabeth Locklear vs Jase Graves / Debra Gregory6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesCharlie Culpepper / Melanie Bell vs Jill Gonzalez / Arturo Ojeda Peraza7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2023-08-09vs Dong - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesMelanie Bell / Robert Fabbro vs Mary Ehlers / Kyle Ehlers7-5, 7-5
2023-08-02vs Hyde-White - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesMelanie Bell / Robert Fabbro vs Alexander Moore / Karen Penn6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Colton Wilson
published 4
3.88
Kyle Wilson
published
3.80
Robert Fabbro
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
3.74
Michael Yager
published
3.62
Natalie Mcelhany
published
3.56
Denise Prindiville
published 3.5
3.53
David Bushing
published 4
3.52
Amanda Brown
published 4
3.29
Melanie Bell
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
April Schweigert
published 3.5
Elizabeth Locklear
published 3.5
3.09
Charlie Culpepper
published 3.5
Zachary Schweigert
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Mcelhany + Zachary Schweigert303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Colton Wilson
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.92
Kyle Wilson
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.88
Robert Fabbro
143W–78L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
Mary Catherine Harper
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
Michael Yager
13W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Natalie Mcelhany
29W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%18%82%
3.62
3.5
Denise Prindiville
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.56
4
David Bushing
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Amanda Brown
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.52
Melanie Bell
39W–28L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
April Schweigert
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Locklear
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Charlie Culpepper
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
Zachary Schweigert
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.