Teams

De.Farmer18S3.0

2023 Cap 18 & Over Singles League · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-19vs Sh.Brodsgaard18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesMegan Barrasso vs Pamela Spell6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJamiyla Bolton-Cubillan vs Marilyn Slaymaker7-6, 7-6
2023-07-12vs Mo.Sheets18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesJamiyla Bolton-Cubillan vs Lee Anne Oxford7-6, 6-4
2023-07-06vs Mar.Raper18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesMegan Barrasso vs Catie Cunningham6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2023-06-28vs Mi.Lagerstedt18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesMegan Barrasso vs Erin Hemminger4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-21vs Je.Komes18S3.0Lost 02
L#1 SinglesJamiyla Bolton-Cubillan vs Beth Fletcher1-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesLatoya Clay vs Jenny Komes6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-06-14vs Je.Williams18SLost 02
L#2 SinglesMegan Barrasso vs Jessica Williams6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesLatoya Clay vs Ellina Max4-6, 0-6
2023-06-11vs Da.Rusnak18S3.0Lost 01
L#2 SinglesMegan Barrasso vs Lauren Hardwick1-6, 0-6
2023-05-24vs Ka.King18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesLatoya Clay vs Karen Johnston1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dempsey Farmer
published 4.5
3.35
Stacie White
published
2.84
Latoya Clay
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.83
Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.83
Kelsey Barrasso
published
2.82
Megan Barrasso
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.34
Melissa Hunter
published
Tammera Hill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Barrasso + Kelsey Barrasso5459% games+7.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dempsey Farmer
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stacie White
19W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
2.5
Latoya Clay
89W–62L career · 6 lines in 2023
0%1%99%
2.84
3
Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan
124W–174L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.83
Kelsey Barrasso
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Megan Barrasso
37W–47L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
MaryAdelaide Riddick
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%87%13%
2.34
Melissa Hunter
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tammera Hill
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.