Teams

300 - Zaldivar

2021 Alachua Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.57 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-05-29vs DB - EdelsteinLost 01
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Dickerson vs Tara Edelstein6-7, 2-6
2021-05-23vs DB - GilsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristine Borden / Maria Zaldivar vs Susie Finfrock / Christine Emery3-6, 0-6
2021-05-16vs DB - GilsonSplit 11
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Dickerson vs Genne' DeHenau McDonald1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJill Womble / Davette Wycoff vs Irina Madorsky / Mickie Anderson2-6, 2-6
2021-05-07vs Alachua - Haile/Aces WildLost 02
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Smith / Davette Wycoff vs Gina Dell / Terri Lowery2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMaria Zaldivar / Laura Trefry vs Vinata Vedam-Mai / Helen Ingmarsson6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2021-05-02vs WS - McLaughlinSplit 11
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Dickerson vs Lindy Archambeau6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Trefry / Maria Zaldivar vs Linda Sheehan / Laurie McLaughlin6-7, 3-6
2021-04-27vs Alachua - Haile/Aces WildLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine Engels / Davette Wycoff vs Lori Herman / Kim Magee2-6, 1-6
2021-04-02vs DB - EdelsteinWon 10
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Dickerson vs Caroline Hord6-4, 6-4
2021-04-01vs WS - McLaughlinSplit 11
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Dickerson vs Alicia Pfahler6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJulia Morrisroe / Elizabeth Smith vs Amber Muehlmann / Jigisha Shah0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Elizabeth Dickerson
usually #1 Singles 62%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published 4
3.46
Allison Shinn
published 4
3.20
Christine Borden
published 3.5
3.16
Davette Wycoff
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.14
Julia Morrisroe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Cindy McManus
published 3.5
3.04
Christine Engels
published 3.5
2.76
Linda Vaughn
published
2.57
Maria Zaldivar
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Dickerson
264W–115L career · 13 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Allison Shinn
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Christine Borden
8W–9L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Davette Wycoff
115W–72L career · 6 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.16
Julia Morrisroe
119W–94L career · 6 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Cindy McManus
7W–8L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Christine Engels
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
3.04
Linda Vaughn
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Maria Zaldivar
90W–150L career · 7 lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.