Teams

JCC 55

2026 55 & OVER MEN · 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-02-15vs Game OnLost 12
L#1 DoublesGiovanni DeGerolami / Luis Gerlein vs Lee Stacy / Ricky Shasteen4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKenneth Coleman / Ricky Rosenblum vs Jason Garriott / Kent Power2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeff Henkes / Brian Chase vs Dale Paustian / Mike Wilkinson2-6, 2-6
2026-01-11vs Game OnLost 03
L#1 DoublesFrank Gallegos / Dino Garcia vs Michael Fitzpatrick / Paul Allen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKenneth Coleman / Ricky Rosenblum vs Shawn Kenworthy / Frank Schycker4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Henkes / Jeff Konop vs Kent Power / Jason Garriott6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Kenneth Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Ric Garcia Tagle
published
3.57
Giovanni DeGerolami
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Dino Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Luis Gerlein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Kelly Parks
published
3.34
Jeff Henkes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Brian Chase
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Frank Gallegos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jeff Konop
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mariano Molina
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Chase + Jeff Henkes044 matchesnot enough data
Ric Garcia Tagle + Kenneth Coleman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kenneth Coleman
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Ric Garcia Tagle
2W–6L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Giovanni DeGerolami
23W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.57
Dino Garcia
11W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Luis Gerlein
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Kelly Parks
14W–3L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
Jeff Henkes
26W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
3
Brian Chase
0W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Frank Gallegos
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jeff Konop
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mariano Molina
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.