Teams

Parmentier/Upson

2026 STL Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Combined

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ST. LOUIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-16vs Quick Draw McGraw (Shouldis)Won 21
L#1 DoublesBrent Jones / Michelle Parmentier vs Sam Shouldis / Lori Divin2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMelissa Upson / Dwayne Upson vs Shashi Pathak / Joseph Delsignore6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Ebert Meyer / Matthew Mertens vs Diane Lewis / William Dannevik6-3, 7-5
2026-08-09vs The Big Dogs (White/Winn)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJason Parmentier / Michelle Parmentier vs Megan-Elizabeth Mueller / Shane Jordan2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSeonyoung Kim / Mark Miller vs Kyle Darr / Denise Foley7-6, 3-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Ebert Meyer / Matthew Mertens vs Victoria Winn / Nick Lammers4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-08-02vs RossSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBecky Head / Brent Jones vs Kelli McKie / Paul Rapponotti6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJason Parmentier / Michelle Parmentier vs Melanie Rodman / Patrick Rodman0-6, 3-6
2026-07-26vs Mixed Mayhem (Bostick)Won 21
W#1 DoublesBecky Head / Brent Jones vs Jamie Hansen / Keith Nilsen6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSeonyoung Kim / Mark Miller vs Jim Enright / Adele Ayres4-6, 5-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Ebert Meyer / Matthew Mertens vs Briana Bostick / Thomas Bostick6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-19vs Super Balls (Hardebeck)Won 30
W#1 DoublesBecky Head / Brent Jones vs Ulises Arteaga / Tracy Todd7-5, 4-3
W#2 DoublesMelissa Upson / Dwayne Upson vs Billie Hardebeck / George Hendrix6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJason Parmentier / Karen Ebert Meyer vs Servepreet Singh / Laurie Graves6-1, 6-3
2026-06-28vs Tennis Freaks (Kamat)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSeonyoung Kim / Mark Miller vs Michael O'Neill / Breanna Stenzel2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Upson / Dwayne Upson vs David Kraft / Michelle DuClos2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJason Parmentier / Michelle Parmentier vs Christopher Fikes / Tara Freese Clifford6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-14vs Quick Draw McGraw (Shouldis)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Upson / Dwayne Upson vs Andrea Layton / Asim Hasanovic3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSeonyoung Kim / Mark Miller vs William Dannevik / Martina Augsburger3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Ebert Meyer / Brent Jones vs Vickie Brandt / Nicholas Damato5-7, 6-5, 1-0
2026-06-07vs The Big Dogs (White/Winn)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesBrent Jones / Becky Head vs Kevin Bauer / Tricia Cline3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Parmentier / Jason Parmentier vs Katie White / Craig White1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSeonyoung Kim / Mark Miller vs Kyle Darr / Victoria Winn7-6, 2-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 7.0 Combined
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tennis Freaks (Kamat)6015310135
2The Big Dogs (White/Winn)4212615132
3Super Balls (Hardebeck)43111022180
4Quick Draw McGraw (Shouldis)318412109
5Parmentier/Upson3491228195
6Mixed Mayhem (Bostick)0631531195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Michelle Parmentier
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.19
Becky Head
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Karen Ebert Meyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Brent Jones
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.06
Matthew Mertens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Melissa Upson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.63
Jason Parmentier
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.60
Seonyoung Kim
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Dwayne Upson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Mark Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Parmentier + Jason Parmentier6848% games+1.8% vs expected
Dwayne Upson + Melissa Upson212050% games−0.6% vs expected
Matthew Mertens + Becky Head224 matchesnot enough data
Becky Head + Brent Jones404 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Mertens + Karen Ebert Meyer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Parmentier
71W–61L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Becky Head
94W–55L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Karen Ebert Meyer
78W–99L career · 5 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Brent Jones
51W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Matthew Mertens
90W–93L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
Melissa Upson
128W–133L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
Jason Parmentier
35W–45L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
Seonyoung Kim
55W–34L career · 5 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Dwayne Upson
111W–65L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Miller
22W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.