Teams

West Homewood - Ponder

2026 B'ham Combo - 40 & Over Women Weekday · 5.5 Wednesday

12 players · average NTRP 2.62 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-12vs PRC - Chomicz 5.5 ComboWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnne Tippett / Carlye Dudgeon vs Katherine Willett / Ella Ruth Stewart5-5
L#2 DoublesStephanie Vann / Mandy Rabren vs Gail Bevier / Rebecca Richardson2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJill Deer / Anna Boney vs Yvette Weaver / Alice Chase6-2, 6-0
2026-07-22vs PRC - Chomicz 5.5 ComboWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnne Tippett / Mandy Rabren vs Michelle Segrest / Jessica VanLandingham4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Vann / Mary Katzman vs Katherine Willett / Ella Ruth Stewart6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHolly Stiles / Carrie Hawkins vs Gaile Randall / Brenda Joffe4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Jill Deer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Anne Tippett
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.70
Holly Stiles
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Stephanie Vann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Virginia Pope
published
2.48
Anna Boney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.47
Carlye Dudgeon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.37
Mona Ponder
published
2.23
Mandy Rabren
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.19
Mary Katzman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.16
Heather Alexander
published
2.09
Carrie Hawkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Deer + Holly Stiles134 matchesnot enough data
Carrie Hawkins + Mary Katzman044 matchesnot enough data
Jill Deer + Anne Tippett123 matchesnot enough data
Anne Tippett + Holly Stiles123 matchesnot enough data
Virginia Pope + Stephanie Vann123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Deer
13W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Anne Tippett
28W–38L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Holly Stiles
21W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Stephanie Vann
16W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Virginia Pope
7W–16L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Anna Boney
16W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%55%45%
2.48
2.5
Carlye Dudgeon
11W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
0%58%42%
2.47
Mona Ponder
2W–15L career · no lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.37
Mandy Rabren
8W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
Mary Katzman
13W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Heather Alexander
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
2.5
Carrie Hawkins
10W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.