Teams

Barry

2024 Harford Combo · Harford Combo 7.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.90 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-11-21vs GossLost 02
L#1 DoublesDanielle Barry / Erica Epple vs Natalie Bryson / Erin Deneen7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCathy Preisendorfer / Stephanie Hutcheson vs Laurie Freese / Gina Mannion3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-11-19vs GossLost 01
L#1 DoublesCathy Preisendorfer / Erica Epple vs Natalie Bryson / Erin Deneen6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-11-15vs GossSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCathy Preisendorfer / Heather Hall vs Terri Mrozinski / Erin Deneen7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDanielle Barry / Erica Epple vs Lesley Tompkins / Carolyn Wescott6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-11-13vs GossLost 01
L#3 DoublesSydney James / Erica Epple vs Melanie Goss / Robin Piazza3-6, 5-7
2024-11-07vs GossLost 01
L#1 DoublesCathy Preisendorfer / Erica Epple vs Natalie Bryson / Carolyn Wescott2-6, 2-6
2024-11-01vs GossLost 02
L#1 DoublesDanielle Barry / Erica Epple vs Terri Mrozinski / Carolyn Wescott4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCathy Preisendorfer / Heather Hall vs Melanie Goss / Janet Handy2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-10-30vs GossWon 10
W#2 DoublesCathy Preisendorfer / Heather Hall vs Terri Mrozinski / Janet Handy6-4, 6-4
2024-10-24vs GossLost 02
L#1 DoublesRuzica Ragontse / Danielle Barry vs Erin Deneen / Natalie Bryson1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Hutcheson / Cathy Preisendorfer vs Janet Handy / Bonnie Keating5-7, 2-6
2024-10-10vs GossLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary McClelland / Erica Epple vs Natalie Bryson / Erin Deneen6-7, 1-6
2024-10-02vs GossWon 20
W#1 DoublesDanielle Barry / Erica Epple vs Terri Mrozinski / Tracy Flaherty6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCathy Preisendorfer / Heather Hall vs Janet Handy / Robin Piazza6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Harford Combo 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Danielle Barry
published 4.5
3.93
Ruzica Ragontse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Cathy Preisendorfer
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.71
Mary McClelland
published
3.33
Erica Epple
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Diane Carson
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ruzica Ragontse + Cathy Preisendorfer4353% gamesnot enough data
Erica Epple + Cathy Preisendorfer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Danielle Barry
9W–25L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.97
4
Ruzica Ragontse
84W–74L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Cathy Preisendorfer
147W–136L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.90
Mary McClelland
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Erica Epple
60W–56L career · 15 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Diane Carson
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.