Teams

BM YELLOW

2023 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-08vs SS-H BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesPhilippa Biggi / MaryBeth Doerr vs Stella Madrid / Holly McDonell5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSusan Hickel / Jane Carlson vs Kathy Noll / Donna Rood6-3, 6-2
2023-08-01vs HRCA-N REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesJane Carlson / Nathalia Faribault vs Sara Bogel / Lisa Fellows3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-18vs MVCC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesPatrice Matteson / Nathalia Faribault vs Terri Jenney / Judith McKinney1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesPhilippa Biggi / Susan Hickel vs Tia Heneghan / Sharon Dutton6-2, 6-3
2023-07-12vs SS-H BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesPhilippa Biggi / Carol Markley vs Judith Delein / Judy Marshall1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSusan Hickel / Patrice Matteson vs Donna Rood / Susan Panning6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2023-07-11vs CK REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesPhilippa Biggi / MaryBeth Doerr vs Judy Ferrin / Sheryl Flater6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJanet Lane / Nathalia Faribault vs Alison Rochelle / Ellen McClurkin7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Hickel / Patrice Matteson vs Jennifer Harrop / Mary LeSueur3-6, 4-6
2023-06-27vs HRCA-N REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMaryBeth Doerr / Philippa Biggi vs Sara Bogel / Soonie Yim6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNathalia Faribault / Patrice Matteson vs Lisa Fellows / Irene Scott6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Susan Hickel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Carol Markley
published 3
2.69
Philippa Biggi
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.67
MaryBeth Doerr
published
2.63
Nathalia Faribault
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.22
Jane Carlson
published
Janet Lane
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Hickel + Philippa Biggi101050% games−8.2% vs expected
Susan Hickel + Nathalia Faribault123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Susan Hickel
30W–60L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Carol Markley
20W–36L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Philippa Biggi
62W–106L career · 5 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
MaryBeth Doerr
13W–8L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Nathalia Faribault
30W–55L career · 4 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
2.63
Jane Carlson
5W–19L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
2.22
Janet Lane
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.