Teams

Raulston

2023 Norfolk Tri-Level 18 & Over · 2023 Norfolk Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.20 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-08vs ClaxtonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesShelley Smith / Karen Johnson vs Kimberly McClernon / Lisa Deaver6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesShawen Bartol / Joan Corkery vs Michella Newton / Carrie Yuill4-6, 2-6
2023-12-04vs JordanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSheryl Raulston / Shelley Smith vs Adelle Yanez / Laurie Marshall3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJoan Corkery / Sheila Filipponi vs Megan Farr / Erin Camden6-1, 6-3
2023-11-17vs ClaxtonLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Willard / Shelley Smith vs Liz Tuck / Kimberly McClernon1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesShawen Bartol / Veronica Cummings vs Carrie Yuill / Tessa Robinson2-6, 2-6
2023-11-06vs ClaxtonLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoan Corkery / Sheila Filipponi vs Michella Newton / Tessa Robinson0-6, 6-7
2023-11-03vs JordanLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Johnson / Shelley Smith vs Kelly Martone / Neely Zervakis0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSheila Filipponi / Shawen Bartol vs Megan Farr / Jessica Hoffman-Schmitz4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-10-23vs ClaxtonLost 01
L#3 DoublesVeronica Cummings / Joan Corkery vs Tessa Robinson / Shannon Halter4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-10-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesVeronica Cummings / Shawen Bartol vs Jessica Hoffman-Schmitz / Ann Knepper6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2023 Norfolk Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Susan Willard
published
Angela Gilliam
published 4.5
3.80
Shelley Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.71
Holli Sawyer
published 4
3.70
Mary Snowden-Gordon
published
3.70
Sheila Filipponi
published
3.65
Shawen Bartol
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Veronica Cummings
published
3.55
Joan Corkery
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shawen Bartol + Joan Corkery7453% games−4.9% vs expected
Mary Snowden-Gordon + Joan Corkery314 matchesnot enough data
Veronica Cummings + Holli Sawyer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Willard
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
Angela Gilliam
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Shelley Smith
30W–72L career · 4 lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
3.80
4
Holli Sawyer
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
Mary Snowden-Gordon
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Sheila Filipponi
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Shawen Bartol
73W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.65
Veronica Cummings
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Joan Corkery
64W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.