← Teams

SHC-Mayer

2023 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Alan Kaplan
published 4
—
Steven Garlock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Paul Blankenmeister
published 3.5
3.09
Scott Mayer
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.09
Bert Berends
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.99
Dan Wendling
published 3.5
2.76
Michael Siebers
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Jim George
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
—
Les Wellman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.50
Larry Butrick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-05-11Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesScott Mayer / Steven Garlock vs David Lee / Shirish Patel3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBert Berends / Keith Jones vs KRIKOR NACCACHIAN / Eramo Gonzalez3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-05-04Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesScott Mayer / Keith Jones vs Chip Burczak / Tony Humpage6-2, 6-6
L#2 DoublesBert Berends / Les Wellman vs Jeffrey Bayless / Jim Lekas6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlan Kaplan / Larry Butrick vs Phillip Juckeland / William Reykalin6-1, 6-3
2023-04-28Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesScott Mayer / Paul Blankenmeister vs Steven Ryan / Eramo Gonzalez6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSteven Garlock / Jim George vs Brian Noll / John Walsh6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBob Anderson / Bert Berends vs KRIKOR NACCACHIAN / Shirish Patel6-3, 6-3
2023-04-27Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesBert Berends / Steven Garlock vs Craig Frasier / Robin Olson6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJim George / Les Wellman vs John Hummel / Dave Sato6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2023-04-13Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesLes Wellman / Terry Casebeer vs Robert Piercy / Steve Thunstedt6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAlan Kaplan / Larry Butrick vs John Wallin / Jon Mandeville7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2023-03-30Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMichael Siebers / Terry Casebeer vs Roger North / Philip Rothrock6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLes Wellman / Steven Garlock vs Mark Griffin / Vilath Oudomphong6-1, 6-1
2023-03-23Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesScott Mayer / Steven Garlock vs Mark Griffin / Edward Vranizan6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLarry Butrick / Alan Kaplan vs Steven Boeh / Philip Rothrock6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichael Siebers / Les Wellman vs David Keller / Christopher Thomas7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-03-21Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesMichael Siebers / Les Wellman vs Alan Jones / Mister Archedon6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesScott Mayer / Steven Garlock vs Clay Funkhouser / John Wallin7-6, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Alan Kaplan
11W–13L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Steven Garlock
16W–21L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Paul Blankenmeister
33W–21L career · type S
7%92%0%
3.17
3
Scott Mayer
70W–71L career · type A
0%55%45%
3.09
3.5
Bert Berends
14W–37L career
23%76%0%
3.09
3.5
Dan Wendling
52W–43L career
39%61%0%
2.99
3
Michael Siebers
20W–40L career · type S
6%91%4%
2.76
3
Jim George
30W–21L career
3%95%2%
2.75
3
Les Wellman
43W–42L career
not enough data
—
3
Larry Butrick
47W–55L career
37%63%0%
2.50

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.