Teams

EM BLUE

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-28vs VC PINKLost 03
L#1 DoublesLauren Knight / Sarah Nottingham vs Jennifer Accola / Nicholle Frantz6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMandi Williams vs CJ Bathgate0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNatalie Dean / Jane Morrissey vs Page Rollert / Heather Volkman6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-05-21vs WP-G YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnne Kay / Mandi Williams vs Allison Blue / Elle Jackson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLauren Knight vs Shelby Eng6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJudith Andrews / Jane Morrissey vs Lindsay Rieland / Amy Sumner1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-05-14vs PTC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnne Kay / Lauren Knight vs Christine Trigg / Katy Cafazza6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSarah Nottingham vs Alexandra Swanson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJudith Andrews / Jane Morrissey vs Tekla Petrinovich / Evelyn Snyder0-6, 2-6
2025-05-07vs GCC GOLDLost 12
L#1 DoublesMandi Williams / Sarah Nottingham vs Amanda Lee / Anna Scuderi3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJudith Andrews vs Lucia Milica Stacy3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Lindley / Natalie Dean vs Sachi Osatinski / Danora Gotto6-1, 7-6
2025-04-30vs GAC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesNatalie Dean / Anne Kay vs Taylor Thornburgh / Kris Stern2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLauren Knight vs Anne Campbell7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Lindley / Jane Morrissey vs Leah Putnam / Susan Kleimann2-6, 3-6
2025-04-23vs CHCC PURPLELost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne Kay / Sarah Nottingham vs Ashley Balakas / Paige Reberry6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMandi Williams vs Laura Koelbel2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJane Morrissey / Jacqueline Lindley vs Dana France / Monica Zakovich6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-16vs WP-O NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesMandi Williams / Lauren Knight vs Gwladys Kabore / Katherine Paganucci6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSarah Nottingham vs Kristin Stefanatz6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNatalie Dean / Judith Andrews vs Emily Knight / Jana Krohne7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.62
Mandi Williams
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.60
Lauren Knight
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.51
Sarah Nottingham
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.48
Anne Kay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.44
Jacqueline Lindley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.43
Judith Andrews
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.33
Natalie Dean
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.31
Jane Morrissey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Kay + Mandi Williams4159% games+11.3% vs expected
Lauren Knight + Anne Kay9752% games+4.9% vs expected
Sarah Nottingham + Natalie Dean4160% games+4.0% vs expected
Jane Morrissey + Jacqueline Lindley6355% games+1.5% vs expected
Jane Morrissey + Natalie Dean5554% games+0.8% vs expected
Jane Morrissey + Judith Andrews224 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Nottingham + Judith Andrews224 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Dean + Jacqueline Lindley314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Mandi Williams
47W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%18%82%
2.62
Lauren Knight
32W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
Sarah Nottingham
18W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%46%54%
2.51
2.5
Anne Kay
29W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
2.5
Jacqueline Lindley
15W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%69%31%
2.44
Judith Andrews
17W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%70%30%
2.43
Natalie Dean
23W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.33
Jane Morrissey
25W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.