Teams

BTA-IBM NAVY

2024 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · MEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-08vs LTA-P PURPLELost 02
L#1 DoublesParker Dodd / Greg Muench vs Long Tran / David Serelson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDanny Wages / Rich Gioscia vs Bill Burlage / Roy Parker6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-08-01Won 10
W#2 DoublesParker Dodd / Charles Hoffman vs Ben Esquibel / Paul Choinard6-3, 6-3
2024-07-25vs ARCA REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesParker Dodd / Greg Muench vs Mike Kitt / Mark Flanigan6-1, 6-2
2024-07-11vs LTA-Q GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesParker Dodd / John Nevins vs Ed Kellogg / Don Anderson6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-07-04vs LTA-P PURPLESplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoe Courtney / Parker Dodd vs Bill Burlage / David Serelson6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCharles Hoffman / Danny Wages vs Roy Parker / Fred Todd7-5, 6-2
2024-06-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesParker Dodd / Greg Muench vs Charles Dahlke / Donald Wieland7-5, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Thomas Phillips
published
3.15
Danny Wages
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Parker Dodd
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Charles Hoffman
published 3.5
2.62
Alex Goldstein
published 3
Jerry Price
published
Joe Courtney
published
John Nevins
published
Rich Gioscia
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joe Courtney + Danny Wages6352% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Phillips + Jerry Price4550% gamesnot enough data
Rich Gioscia + Charles Hoffman044 matchesnot enough data
Parker Dodd + Danny Wages123 matchesnot enough data
Parker Dodd + Alex Goldstein123 matchesnot enough data
John Nevins + Thomas Phillips213 matchesnot enough data
Rich Gioscia + Alex Goldstein213 matchesnot enough data
Danny Wages + Alex Goldstein123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Phillips
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Danny Wages
58W–55L career · 2 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Parker Dodd
51W–46L career · 6 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Charles Hoffman
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
25%74%<1%
3.09
3
Alex Goldstein
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
2.62
Jerry Price
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Joe Courtney
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
John Nevins
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rich Gioscia
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.