Teams

SD 7.0 Peninsula TC/ Barnett

2025 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over Winter - SD · SD - 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-15vs SD 7.0 Peninsula TC/ DudleyLost 02
L#1 DoublesJon Cieslak / Lorena Whiteside vs Karen Nguyen / James Capurro3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNadine Utz / Edward Utz vs Kevin Clancy / Erica Miller2-6, 5-7
2025-02-22vs SD 7.0 Balboa Babes/ MubarakLost 01
L#1 DoublesNadine Utz / Edward Utz vs Mohamed Afifi / Hayley Moore2-6, 1-6
2025-02-15vs SD 7.0 Incredoubles @BTC/ EdwardsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNadine Utz / Edward Utz vs Lisa Mallory / DAN CARRICO3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLorena Whiteside / William Carey vs Jennifer Neivert / Raghu Shettigar4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-01-18vs SD 7.0 Pacific Beach TC/ SearcyLost 01
L#1 DoublesJon Cieslak / Lorena Whiteside vs Sarah Eade / Timothy Searcy6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-01-11vs SD 7.0 SDTRC/ AdamsWon 10
W#1 DoublesLorena Whiteside / Jon Cieslak vs Ramiro Muzquiz / Amy Hamric6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Nadine Utz
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.83
Elizabeth McLean
published
3.70
Jon Cieslak
published
3.55
Lorena Whiteside
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.36
Lisa Carey
published
3.33
George Benakos
published
3.22
William Carey
published
3.05
Jo Ann Stewart
published
Edwin Monclova
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Carey + William Carey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nadine Utz
207W–51L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
4.40
Elizabeth McLean
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Jon Cieslak
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
3.5
Lorena Whiteside
77W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.55
Lisa Carey
25W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.36
George Benakos
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
William Carey
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Jo Ann Stewart
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Edwin Monclova
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.