Teams

NMerritt-HR

2025 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-02vs SBrock-CHTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesSharon Huang / Jennifer Rousseau vs Elizabeth Keating / Heidi Blankenship6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSheana Funkhouser / Melissa Lutz vs Amy Strong / Tammy Bradley2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNancee Merritt / Leona Buckley vs Anna Creissen / Sara Summers6-4, 6-3
2025-09-25vs DErwin-DURSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMary Fortin / Kay Mabe vs Christina Allen / Rebecca Edwards7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesErin Reiter / Gayathri Rajaraman vs Dianna Erwin / Kelly Townsend4-6, 4-6
2025-09-18vs PDovel-DURLost 01
L#3 DoublesGayathri Rajaraman / Elizabeth Wyngaarden vs Patrice Dovel / Carolyn Lee2-6, 2-6
2025-09-11vs ACrumpler-DURLost 01
L#1 DoublesKay Mabe / Gayathri Rajaraman vs Stephanie Disbrow / Allison Crumpler1-6, 3-6
2025-09-04vs KTravis7.5-DURWon 20
W#2 DoublesKay Mabe / Mimi Miles vs Joyce Robinson / Krissy Anderson6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMary Fortin / Melissa Lutz vs Colleen Davis / Elyssa Millard7-5, 6-4
2025-08-24vs DErwin-DURSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBeth Huebner / Mary Fortin vs Elizabeth Matthews / Cameron Ellerbe6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKay Mabe / Gayathri Rajaraman vs Rachel Matthews / Heather Roberts3-6, 3-6
2025-08-21vs KMcWhorter7.5-HVCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesGayathri Rajaraman / Elizabeth Wyngaarden vs Nancy Pike / Lora Alkhawam2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Beth Huebner
published 4
3.80
Kay Mabe
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Nancee Merritt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Melissa Lutz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Mimi Miles
published
3.45
Elizabeth Wyngaarden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.41
Jennifer Rousseau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Erin Reiter
published
3.38
Sheana Funkhouser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Leona Buckley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Jaime Parker
published
3.10
Mary Fortin
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Gayathri Rajaraman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kay Mabe + Elizabeth Wyngaarden91150% games−5.1% vs expected
Kay Mabe + Mary Fortin6753% gamesnot enough data
Mary Fortin + Elizabeth Wyngaarden5252% gamesnot enough data
Kay Mabe + Melissa Lutz134 matchesnot enough data
Kay Mabe + Gayathri Rajaraman044 matchesnot enough data
Mary Fortin + Sheana Funkhouser134 matchesnot enough data
Sheana Funkhouser + Leona Buckley224 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Lutz + Nancee Merritt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth Huebner
37W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
4.09
4
Kay Mabe
139W–143L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Nancee Merritt
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Melissa Lutz
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.58
Mimi Miles
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
4
Elizabeth Wyngaarden
111W–133L career · 2 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
Jennifer Rousseau
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.41
Erin Reiter
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.39
Sheana Funkhouser
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Leona Buckley
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Jaime Parker
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Mary Fortin
113W–105L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Gayathri Rajaraman
55W–63L career · 5 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.