Teams

Bashi Bazooks

2023 Montgomery Combo Winter · Montgomery Combo 8.5 Men

15 players · average NTRP 4.11 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-04-02vs Smashers ComboWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrian Bichy / Garrett Kessler vs Christopher Andall / Bradley Jacques6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesThomas Leuba / Thomas Berray vs Gregory Fox / Henry Forster3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDaniel Lawson / Bengt Liljas vs Bill Gehrke / Fatih Selekler7-5, 6-1
2023-03-21vs IvanLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrent Kendall / Sinan Kalayoglu vs Geoffrey Montgomery / Suraj Goyle7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-03-09vs Smashers ComboWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrent Kendall / Sinan Kalayoglu vs Justin Cady / Bradley Jacques6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBengt Liljas / Thomas Berray vs Christopher Bragale / Christopher Andall7-5, 6-2
2023-02-25vs IvanLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Whitall / Tzuhsiu Chiou vs Steven Dunne / Suraj Goyle1-6, 2-6
2023-02-08vs IvanWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrent Kendall / Sinan Kalayoglu vs Steven Dunne / Florian Kogelnik6-2, 6-1
2023-02-04vs Smashers ComboLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrian Bichy / Zaf Basha vs Tim Huber / Bradley Jacques5-7, 5-7
2023-01-24vs IvanWon 10
W#2 DoublesTzuhsiu Chiou / Bengt Liljas vs Suraj Goyle / Tom Oda6-4, 6-2
2023-01-21vs Smashers ComboWon 20
W#2 DoublesBrian Bichy / Daniel Williams vs Kieran Coscia / Fatih Selekler7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Whitall / Brent Kendall vs Bill Gehrke / Alan Klein4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-01-14vs IvanWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Whitall / Brian Bichy vs Tom Oda / Suraj Goyle6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Barry Weiner
published 4.5
4.16
Brian Bichy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.12
Hong Hu
published
3.94
Brent Kendall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.88
Thomas Berray
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.81
Bengt Liljas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Thomas Leuba
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.79
J Nathan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.76
Joshua Folk
published
Daniel Lawson
published 4
3.60
David Whitall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Paul Brennan
published
John Payne
published
Sinan Kalayoglu
published
Zaf Basha
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Bichy + Brent Kendall211154% games−1.0% vs expected
Bengt Liljas + Brent Kendall7652% games−14.1% vs expected
Thomas Leuba + J Nathan9756% gamesnot enough data
Brian Bichy + David Whitall6259% gamesnot enough data
Bengt Liljas + Brian Bichy2440% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Leuba + David Whitall1440% gamesnot enough data
Brent Kendall + David Whitall3251% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Berray + David Whitall224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Barry Weiner
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.24
4.5
Brian Bichy
170W–103L career · 4 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
Hong Hu
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
4.12
4
Brent Kendall
184W–123L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Thomas Berray
80W–91L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.88
4
Bengt Liljas
128W–99L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Thomas Leuba
98W–92L career · 7 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.80
4
J Nathan
124W–108L career · 10 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
Joshua Folk
24W–25L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Daniel Lawson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
David Whitall
78W–80L career · 3 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.60
Paul Brennan
4W–12L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.54
John Payne
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sinan Kalayoglu
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Zaf Basha
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.